Received: from 173-13-139-235-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.13.139.235]:56916 helo=jukni.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1etaKE-00063L-5d for jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2018 06:45:52 -0800 Received: by jukni.digitalkingdom.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 07 Mar 2018 06:45:49 -0800 From: "Apache" To: curtis289@att.net Reply-To: webmaster@lojban.org Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word di'ardu'edi'i -- By gleki Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 06:45:49 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: 3.1 (+++) X-Spam_score: 3.1 X-Spam_score_int: 31 X-Spam_bar: +++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: In jbovlaste, the user gleki has edited a definition of "di'ardu'edi'i" in the language "English". Differences: 5,5c5,5 < Beware sumti-raising. If the ownership of an item costs 9.50$ and $x_3$ buys it with an acceptable bill of value 10.00$, then the change ($x_1$) is the monetary value of 0.50$ (regardless of [...] Content analysis details: (3.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: lojban.org] 1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: No description available. [173.13.139.235 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 2.6 TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP To: lacks brackets and dynamic rDNS In jbovlaste, the user gleki has edited a definition of "di'ardu'edi'i" in the language "English". Differences: 5,5c5,5 < Beware sumti-raising. If the ownership of an item costs 9.50$ and $x_3$ buys it with an acceptable bill of value 10.00$, then the change ($x_1$) is the monetary value of 0.50$ (regardless of which bills, coins, etc. carry that value), where "$" can represent any monetary unit. --- > Beware sumti-raising. If the ownership of an item costs 9.50 dollars and $x_3$ buys it with an acceptable bill of value 10.00 dollars, then the change ($x_1$) is the monetary value of 0.50 dollars (regardless of which bills, coins, etc. carry that value), where 'dollar' can represent any monetary unit. Old Data: Definition: $x_1$ is the excess money/change (that should be) returned for/after/with the purchase of $x_2$ by purchaser $x_3$ from vendor $x_4$. Notes: Beware sumti-raising. If the ownership of an item costs 9.50$ and $x_3$ buys it with an acceptable bill of value 10.00$, then the change ($x_1$) is the monetary value of 0.50$ (regardless of which bills, coins, etc. carry that value), where "$" can represent any monetary unit. Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: change, In Sense: excess money returned after purchase Place Keywords: New Data: Definition: $x_1$ is the excess money/change (that should be) returned for/after/with the purchase of $x_2$ by purchaser $x_3$ from vendor $x_4$. Notes: Beware sumti-raising. If the ownership of an item costs 9.50 dollars and $x_3$ buys it with an acceptable bill of value 10.00 dollars, then the change ($x_1$) is the monetary value of 0.50 dollars (regardless of which bills, coins, etc. carry that value), where 'dollar' can represent any monetary unit. Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: change, In Sense: excess money returned after purchase Place Keywords: You can go to to see it.