Received: from 173-13-139-235-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.13.139.235]:57540 helo=jukni.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1etaO0-0006I1-2M for jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2018 06:49:45 -0800 Received: by jukni.digitalkingdom.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 07 Mar 2018 06:49:43 -0800 From: "Apache" To: curtis289@att.net Reply-To: webmaster@lojban.org Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word praperi -- By gleki Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 06:49:43 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: 3.1 (+++) X-Spam_score: 3.1 X-Spam_score_int: 31 X-Spam_bar: +++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: In jbovlaste, the user gleki has edited a definition of "praperi" in the language "English". Differences: 2,2c2,2 < $x_1$ is a strict/proper sub-$x_2$ [structure] in/of $x_3$; $x_2$ is a structure and $x_1$ and $x_3$ are both examples of that structure $x_2$ such that $x_1$ is entirely contained within $x [...] Content analysis details: (3.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: No description available. [173.13.139.235 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 2.6 TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP To: lacks brackets and dynamic rDNS In jbovlaste, the user gleki has edited a definition of "praperi" in the language "English". Differences: 2,2c2,2 < $x_1$ is a strict/proper sub-$x_2$ [structure] in/of $x_3$; $x_2$ is a structure and $x_1$ and $x_3$ are both examples of that structure $x_2$ such that $x_1$ is entirely contained within $x_3$ (where containment is defined according to the standard/characteristics/definition of $x_2$; but in any case, no member/part/element that belongs to $x_1$ does not also belong to $x_3, but there is some member/part/element of $x_3$ that does not belong to $x_1$ in the same way). --- > $x_1$ is a strict/proper sub-$x_2$ [structure] in/of $x_3$; $x_2$ is a structure and $x_1$ and $x_3$ are both examples of that structure $x_2$ such that $x_1$ is entirely contained within $x_3$ (where containment is defined according to the standard/characteristics/definition of $x_2$; but in any case, no member/part/element that belongs to $x_1$ does not also belong to $x_3$, but there is some member/part/element of $x_3$ that does not belong to $x_1$ in the same way). Old Data: Definition: $x_1$ is a strict/proper sub-$x_2$ [structure] in/of $x_3$; $x_2$ is a structure and $x_1$ and $x_3$ are both examples of that structure $x_2$ such that $x_1$ is entirely contained within $x_3$ (where containment is defined according to the standard/characteristics/definition of $x_2$; but in any case, no member/part/element that belongs to $x_1$ does not also belong to $x_3, but there is some member/part/element of $x_3$ that does not belong to $x_1$ in the same way). Notes: If x2 is a (sub)set, then x1 is a proper subset of x3; if x2 is a mathematical/algebraic (sub)group, then x1 is a proper subgroup of x3; etc. Can also be used for describing proper sub-lakes (such as Lake Michigan), proper super-selma'o, and other non-mathmetical usages. x3 is a proper super-x2 of/with x1. Biological taxa, if comparable, are usually/hypothetically proper. See also: {klesi}, {enklesi}, {cletu}, {cmeta}. Jargon: Mathematics, but possible in laic speak Gloss Keywords: Word: proper substructure, In Sense: Word: strictly-sub-structure, In Sense: Word: strict substructure, In Sense: Place Keywords: New Data: Definition: $x_1$ is a strict/proper sub-$x_2$ [structure] in/of $x_3$; $x_2$ is a structure and $x_1$ and $x_3$ are both examples of that structure $x_2$ such that $x_1$ is entirely contained within $x_3$ (where containment is defined according to the standard/characteristics/definition of $x_2$; but in any case, no member/part/element that belongs to $x_1$ does not also belong to $x_3$, but there is some member/part/element of $x_3$ that does not belong to $x_1$ in the same way). Notes: If x2 is a (sub)set, then x1 is a proper subset of x3; if x2 is a mathematical/algebraic (sub)group, then x1 is a proper subgroup of x3; etc. Can also be used for describing proper sub-lakes (such as Lake Michigan), proper super-selma'o, and other non-mathmetical usages. x3 is a proper super-x2 of/with x1. Biological taxa, if comparable, are usually/hypothetically proper. See also: {klesi}, {enklesi}, {cletu}, {cmeta}. Jargon: Mathematics, but possible in laic speak Gloss Keywords: Word: proper substructure, In Sense: Word: strictly-sub-structure, In Sense: Word: strict substructure, In Sense: Place Keywords: You can go to to see it.