From: "Apache" <apache@digitalkingdom.org>
To: ciuak.prog@gmail.com, gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com
Reply-To: webmaster@lojban.org
Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word kompromata -- By ractu
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 14:20:31 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <E1fIhN1-0004sG-G0@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
X-Spam_score: 3.1
X-Spam_score_int: 31
X-Spam_bar: +++
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  In jbovlaste, the user ractu has edited a definition of "kompromata"
    in the language "English". Differences: 2,2c2,2 < $x_1$ is an instance of
    blackmail (not necessarily in written form) posted by $x_3$ to $x_4$, thereby
    threatening that $x_2$ (threat) may be done unless $x_5$, constructed in
   an attempt to f [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (3.1 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
                             See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: lojban.org]
  1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT   RBL: No description available.
                             [173.13.139.235 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org]
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
                             [score: 0.0000]
  1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC           Delivered to internal network by host with
                             dynamic-looking rDNS
  2.6 TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP      To: lacks brackets and dynamic rDNS


In jbovlaste, the user ractu has edited a
definition of "kompromata" in the language "English".

Differences:

2,2c2,2
< 		$x_1$ is an instance of blackmail (not necessarily in written form) posted by $x_3$ to $x_4$, thereby threatening that $x_2$ (threat) may be done unless $x_5$, constructed in an attempt to force $x_4$ to take action $x_5$.
---
> 		$x_1$ is an instance of blackmail (not necessarily in written form) by $x_3$ to $x_4$, thereby threatening that $x_2$ may happen, unless $x_5$, constructed in an attempt to force $x_4$ to take action $x_5$.


Old Data:

	Definition:
		$x_1$ is an instance of blackmail (not necessarily in written form) posted by $x_3$ to $x_4$, thereby threatening that $x_2$ (threat) may be done unless $x_5$, constructed in an attempt to force $x_4$ to take action $x_5$.

	Notes:
		While this argument structure might seem bloated, it captures the essence of blackmailing.

	Jargon:
		

	Gloss Keywords:

	Place Keywords:


New Data:

	Definition:
		$x_1$ is an instance of blackmail (not necessarily in written form) by $x_3$ to $x_4$, thereby threatening that $x_2$ may happen, unless $x_5$, constructed in an attempt to force $x_4$ to take action $x_5$.

	Notes:
		While this argument structure might seem bloated, it captures the essence of blackmailing.

	Jargon:
		

	Gloss Keywords:

	Place Keywords:


You can go to <http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/dict/kompromata> to see it.