Received: from 173-13-139-235-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.13.139.235]:57664 helo=jukni.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fNlmm-0007bn-Qo for jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 14:04:06 -0700 Received: by jukni.digitalkingdom.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 29 May 2018 14:04:04 -0700 From: "Apache" To: lynn@foldr.moe Reply-To: webmaster@lojban.org Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word utka -- By krtisfranks Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 14:04:04 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: 3.1 (+++) X-Spam_score: 3.1 X-Spam_score_int: 31 X-Spam_bar: +++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a definition of "utka" in the language "English". Differences: Old Data: Content analysis details: (3.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: lojban.org] 1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: No description available. [173.13.139.235 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0049] 1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 2.6 TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP To: lacks brackets and dynamic rDNS In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a definition of "utka" in the language "English". Differences: Old Data: Definition: $x_1$ and $x_2$ are path-linked by binary predicate $x_3$ (ka) via steps $x_4$ (ce'o list) Notes: For example, "lo stedu ku utka lo birka lo ka (ce'u ce'u) lamji" is true, with $x_4$ equal to something like "lo cnebo ce'o lo cutne ce'o lo janco". (Also: "lo stedu ku {lamji'utka} lo birka".) Formally, "utka$(A, B, P,$ [$L_1...L_n$]$)$" is equivalent to "P(A, L_1) and P(L_1, L_2) and ... and P(L_{(n-1)}, L_n) and P(L_n, B)". The $x_4$ may be empty ("lo {nomei}") if there are no intermediate steps (id est: the path-linking is direct between $x_1$ and $x_2$). Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Place Keywords: New Data: Definition: $x_1$ and $x_2$ are path-linked by binary predicate $x_3$ (ka) via steps $x_4$ (ce'o list) Notes: For example, "lo stedu ku utka lo birka lo ka (ce'u ce'u) lamji" is true, with $x_4$ equal to something like "lo cnebo ce'o lo cutne ce'o lo janco". (Also: "lo stedu ku {lamji'utka} lo birka".) Formally, "utka$(A, B, P,$ [$L_1...L_n$]$)$" is equivalent to "P(A, L_1) and P(L_1, L_2) and ... and P(L_{(n-1)}, L_n) and P(L_n, B)". The $x_4$ may be empty ("lo {nomei}") if there are no intermediate steps (id est: the path-linking is direct between $x_1$ and $x_2$). Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Place Keywords: You can go to to see it.