Received: from 173-13-139-235-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.13.139.235]:39062 helo=jukni.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fR2wG-0004Dq-BA for jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 14:59:27 -0700 Received: by jukni.digitalkingdom.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 07 Jun 2018 14:59:24 -0700 From: "Apache" To: la.xabju@gmail.com Reply-To: webmaster@lojban.org Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word capsi'o -- By Xabju Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 14:59:24 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.9 X-Spam_score_int: -8 X-Spam_bar: / In jbovlaste, the user Xabju has edited a definition of "capsi'o" in the language "English". Differences: 5,5c5,5 < The being put in jeopardy by the concept is not necessarily the thinker of the concept. For example, the concept of a certain type of terrorist act is not (only) dangerous to the would-be terrorist. 'Thought hazard' is a broader concept than 'informational hazard' and 'knowledge hazard' ({junsi'o}), which have to do with dangerous ideas that are true. [See Bostrom (2011).] --- > The being put in jeopardy by the concept is not necessarily the thinker of the concept. For example, the concept of a certain type of terrorist act is not (only) dangerous to the would-be terrorist. 'Thought hazard' is a broader concept than 'informational hazard' and 'knowledge hazard' ({capyju'o}), which have to do with dangerous ideas that are true. [See Bostrom (2011).] Synonymous with {sibyckape}, which some may prefer. Old Data: Definition: $s_1=c_1$ is an idea/concept/thought that is potentially harmful to $c_2$ under conditions $c_3$. Notes: The being put in jeopardy by the concept is not necessarily the thinker of the concept. For example, the concept of a certain type of terrorist act is not (only) dangerous to the would-be terrorist. 'Thought hazard' is a broader concept than 'informational hazard' and 'knowledge hazard' ({junsi'o}), which have to do with dangerous ideas that are true. [See Bostrom (2011).] Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: dangerous idea, In Sense: Word: dangerous thought, In Sense: Word: harmful idea, In Sense: Word: ideational hazard, In Sense: Word: thought hazard, In Sense: Place Keywords: Word: dangerous thought, In Sense: , For Place: 1 Word: potential victim, In Sense: being jeopardized by thought, For Place: 2 Word: conditions of danger, In Sense: conditions potentiating danger, For Place: 3 New Data: Definition: $s_1=c_1$ is an idea/concept/thought that is potentially harmful to $c_2$ under conditions $c_3$. Notes: The being put in jeopardy by the concept is not necessarily the thinker of the concept. For example, the concept of a certain type of terrorist act is not (only) dangerous to the would-be terrorist. 'Thought hazard' is a broader concept than 'informational hazard' and 'knowledge hazard' ({capyju'o}), which have to do with dangerous ideas that are true. [See Bostrom (2011).] Synonymous with {sibyckape}, which some may prefer. Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: dangerous idea, In Sense: Word: dangerous thought, In Sense: Word: harmful idea, In Sense: Word: ideational hazard, In Sense: Word: thought hazard, In Sense: Place Keywords: Word: dangerous thought, In Sense: , For Place: 1 Word: potential victim, In Sense: being jeopardized by thought, For Place: 2 Word: conditions of danger, In Sense: conditions potentiating danger, For Place: 3 You can go to to see it.