From: "Apache" <apache@digitalkingdom.org>
To: curtis289@att.net
Reply-To: webmaster@lojban.org
Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word gicmu -- By krtisfranks
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 17:17:45 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <E1fvX8D-0005EL-Rr@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
X-Spam_score: -0.9
X-Spam_score_int: -8
X-Spam_bar: /


In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a
definition of "gicmu" in the language "English".

Differences:

5,5c5,5
< 		This word is meant to have exactly the same meaning, notes, restrictions, associations, etc. as {gismu}; the two words are intended to be identical in every way except for four- and five-letter rafsi (and the obvious phonetic/spelling difference). The cmarafsi for this word are "-gim-" and "-gi'u-". Etymologically, this word should have been chosen rather than {gismu} (according to the CLL (see the gismu creation algorithm): https://lojban.github.io/cll/4/14/ step #5), but there was an error in the input/transcription; however, due to gimkamsmikezypro, these two forms are identical in meaning and every other important characteristic or property or endowment, excepting associated rafsi options; the preferred version of all members of the "{gismu}" quotient/equivalence class (presently "{gismu}" itself) determines the potential or actualized rafsi associated with that class; in this case (between "{gicmu}" and "{gismu}"), only the longer rafsi are affected (no cmarafsi of "{gismu}" use the "s").
---
> 		This word is meant to have exactly the same meaning, notes, restrictions, associations, etc. as {gismu}; the two words are intended to be identical in every way except for four- and five-letter rafsi (and the obvious phonetic/spelling difference). The cmarafsi for this word are "-gim-" and "-gi'u-". Etymologically, this word should have been chosen rather than {gismu} (according to the CLL (see the gismu creation algorithm): https://lojban.github.io/cll/4/14/ step #5), but there was an error in the input/transcription; however, due to {gimkamsmikezypro}, these two forms are identical in meaning and every other important characteristic or property or endowment, excepting only some associated rafsi options; the preferred version of all members of the "{gismu}" quotient/equivalence class (presently "{gismu}" itself) determines the potential or actualized rafsi associated with that class; in this case (between "{gicmu}" and "{gismu}"), only the longer rafsi are affected (no cmarafsi of "{gismu}" use the "s"). Even then, any lujvo using the {brarafsi} "-gicm(y)-" would be understood to isomorphically correspond with "gicmu", which must be equivalent to "gismu" by gimkamsmikezypro.


Old Data:

	Definition:
		$x_{1}$ is a (Lojban) root word expressing relation $x_{2}$ among argument roles $x_{3}$, with affix(es) $x_{4}$.

	Notes:
		This word is meant to have exactly the same meaning, notes, restrictions, associations, etc. as {gismu}; the two words are intended to be identical in every way except for four- and five-letter rafsi (and the obvious phonetic/spelling difference). The cmarafsi for this word are "-gim-" and "-gi'u-". Etymologically, this word should have been chosen rather than {gismu} (according to the CLL (see the gismu creation algorithm): https://lojban.github.io/cll/4/14/ step #5), but there was an error in the input/transcription; however, due to gimkamsmikezypro, these two forms are identical in meaning and every other important characteristic or property or endowment, excepting associated rafsi options; the preferred version of all members of the "{gismu}" quotient/equivalence class (presently "{gismu}" itself) determines the potential or actualized rafsi associated with that class; in this case (between "{gicmu}" and "{gismu}"), only the longer rafsi are affected (no cmarafsi of "{gismu}" use the "s").

	Jargon:
		

	Gloss Keywords:
		Word: gismu, In Sense: 
		Word: root word, In Sense: 

	Place Keywords:


New Data:

	Definition:
		$x_{1}$ is a (Lojban) root word expressing relation $x_{2}$ among argument roles $x_{3}$, with affix(es) $x_{4}$.

	Notes:
		This word is meant to have exactly the same meaning, notes, restrictions, associations, etc. as {gismu}; the two words are intended to be identical in every way except for four- and five-letter rafsi (and the obvious phonetic/spelling difference). The cmarafsi for this word are "-gim-" and "-gi'u-". Etymologically, this word should have been chosen rather than {gismu} (according to the CLL (see the gismu creation algorithm): https://lojban.github.io/cll/4/14/ step #5), but there was an error in the input/transcription; however, due to {gimkamsmikezypro}, these two forms are identical in meaning and every other important characteristic or property or endowment, excepting only some associated rafsi options; the preferred version of all members of the "{gismu}" quotient/equivalence class (presently "{gismu}" itself) determines the potential or actualized rafsi associated with that class; in this case (between "{gicmu}" and "{gismu}"), only the longer rafsi are affected (no cmarafsi of "{gismu}" use the "s"). Even then, any lujvo using the {brarafsi} "-gicm(y)-" would be understood to isomorphically correspond with "gicmu", which must be equivalent to "gismu" by gimkamsmikezypro.

	Jargon:
		

	Gloss Keywords:
		Word: gismu, In Sense: 
		Word: root word, In Sense: 

	Place Keywords:


You can go to <http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/dict/gicmu> to see it.