Received: from 173-13-139-235-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.13.139.235]:39034 helo=jukni.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gDGvg-0000NI-Ea for jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 15:38:10 -0700 Received: by jukni.digitalkingdom.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 18 Oct 2018 15:38:08 -0700 From: "Apache" To: curtis289@att.net Reply-To: webmaster@lojban.org Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word ukse -- By krtisfranks Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 15:38:08 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam_score: 1.8 X-Spam_score_int: 18 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a definition of "ukse" in the language "English". Differences: 2,2c2,2 < $x_1$ is/does/has characteristic/has so much of $x_2$ in attempt (at least to the point) that it no longer actually qualifies as such by standard $x_3$ --- > $x_1$ is/does/has characteristic [...] Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: lojban.org] 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4892] 1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a definition of "ukse" in the language "English". Differences: 2,2c2,2 < $x_1$ is/does/has characteristic/has so much of $x_2$ in attempt (at least to the point) that it no longer actually qualifies as such by standard $x_3$ --- > $x_1$ is/does/has characteristic/has so much of $x_2$ (ka) in attempt (at least to the point) that it no longer actually qualifies as such by standard $x_3$ 5,5c5,5 < This word is an 'opposite' to "sufficient" in a certain sense: where sufficiency is true of any amount exceeding a certain infimum, this concept is true of any amount exceeding a certain supremum. The "hyper-" in "hypercorrect" would be this word. --- > This word is an 'opposite' to "sufficient" in a certain sense: where sufficiency is true of any amount exceeding a certain infimum, this concept is true of any amount exceeding a certain supremum. The "hyper-" in "hypercorrect" would be this word. See also: "{raunzu}". Old Data: Definition: $x_1$ is/does/has characteristic/has so much of $x_2$ in attempt (at least to the point) that it no longer actually qualifies as such by standard $x_3$ Notes: This word is an 'opposite' to "sufficient" in a certain sense: where sufficiency is true of any amount exceeding a certain infimum, this concept is true of any amount exceeding a certain supremum. The "hyper-" in "hypercorrect" would be this word. Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: hyper-, In Sense: excessive; beyond the supremum; so much so it is not Place Keywords: New Data: Definition: $x_1$ is/does/has characteristic/has so much of $x_2$ (ka) in attempt (at least to the point) that it no longer actually qualifies as such by standard $x_3$ Notes: This word is an 'opposite' to "sufficient" in a certain sense: where sufficiency is true of any amount exceeding a certain infimum, this concept is true of any amount exceeding a certain supremum. The "hyper-" in "hypercorrect" would be this word. See also: "{raunzu}". Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: hyper-, In Sense: excessive; beyond the supremum; so much so it is not Place Keywords: You can go to to see it.