Received: from [192.168.123.254] (port=34238 helo=jukni.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hOkrI-0007OK-P1 for jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org; Thu, 09 May 2019 08:21:23 -0700 Received: by jukni.digitalkingdom.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 09 May 2019 08:21:20 -0700 From: "Apache" To: curtis289@att.net Reply-To: webmaster@lojban.org Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word pavmompazy'utka'ypanzi -- By krtisfranks Date: Thu, 9 May 2019 08:21:20 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_bar: -- In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a definition of "pavmompazy'utka'ypanzi" in the language "English". Differences: 5,5c5,5 < The children of $x_2$ are possible candidates for $x_1$ due to trivial contraction of the relation. As an example: if Queen Elizabeth II of the UK/Commonwealth is $x_2$ and chronological order of birth for legitimate children (gender-neutral primogeniture on legitimate descent) is used as $x_4$, then the set of possible $x_1$s includes (and, as of 9 May A.D. 2019, is equal to the set of) all of the children of Elizabeth II, the legitimate children of her son Charles (William, Harry), and all of William's children (George, Charlotte, Louis); notice that the descendants of Elizabeth II not via Charles are excluded, as are any descendants not by William (including Harry's children); the next generation of possible $x_1$s will be (supposing that they come to exist) the children of George (the first-born legitimate son of William first-born legitimate son of Charles first-born legitimate son of Queen Elizabeth II) but not the descendants of William not by George; the fact that all of the intermediate steps are male is mere coincidence; this selbri in this example is a generalization of how the title "prince" is automatically bestowed in this line (excluding by marriage), at present, except for those who are granted princehood by virtue of being the children of the sons of the sovereign or possibly by virtue of being grandchildren of the sons of the sovereign in the direct male line other than those of the eldest sons of each generation. See: "{pavmompazy'utka}". --- > The children of $x_2$ are possible candidates for $x_1$ due to trivial contraction of the relation. As an example: if Queen Elizabeth II of the UK/Commonwealth is $x_2$ and chronological order of birth for legitimate children (gender-neutral primogeniture on legitimate descent) is used as $x_4$, then the set of possible $x_1$s includes (and, as of 9 May A.D. 2019, is equal to the set of) all of the children of Elizabeth II, the legitimate children of her son Charles (William, Harry), and all of William's children (George, Charlotte, Louis); notice that the descendants of Elizabeth II not via Charles are excluded, as are any descendants not by William (including Harry's children); the next generation of possible $x_1$s will be (supposing that they come to exist) the children of George (the first-born legitimate son of William first-born legitimate son of Charles first-born legitimate son of Queen Elizabeth II) but not the descendants of William not by George; the fact that all of the intermediate steps are male is mere coincidence; this selbri in this example is a generalization of how the title "prince" is automatically bestowed in this line (excluding by marriage), at present, except for those who are granted princehood by virtue of being the children of the sons of the sovereign. See: "{pavmompazy'utka}". Old Data: Definition: $x_1$ is any child of the first child of the first child of ... the first child of $x_2$, with intermediate steps $x_3$ (complete ordered list, "ce'o"; should include the relevant parent of $x_1$), where "first" is according to (partial) ordering rule $x_4$ (default: chronological order of birth per successive generation within the given lineage; other restrictions on legitimacy etc. may be specified here as well). Notes: The children of $x_2$ are possible candidates for $x_1$ due to trivial contraction of the relation. As an example: if Queen Elizabeth II of the UK/Commonwealth is $x_2$ and chronological order of birth for legitimate children (gender-neutral primogeniture on legitimate descent) is used as $x_4$, then the set of possible $x_1$s includes (and, as of 9 May A.D. 2019, is equal to the set of) all of the children of Elizabeth II, the legitimate children of her son Charles (William, Harry), and all of William's children (George, Charlotte, Louis); notice that the descendants of Elizabeth II not via Charles are excluded, as are any descendants not by William (including Harry's children); the next generation of possible $x_1$s will be (supposing that they come to exist) the children of George (the first-born legitimate son of William first-born legitimate son of Charles first-born legitimate son of Queen Elizabeth II) but not the descendants of William not by George; the fact that all of the intermediate steps are male is mere coincidence; this selbri in this example is a generalization of how the title "prince" is automatically bestowed in this line (excluding by marriage), at present, except for those who are granted princehood by virtue of being the children of the sons of the sovereign or possibly by virtue of being grandchildren of the sons of the sovereign in the direct male line other than those of the eldest sons of each generation. See: "{pavmompazy'utka}". Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: child of primogenitic line, In Sense: Place Keywords: New Data: Definition: $x_1$ is any child of the first child of the first child of ... the first child of $x_2$, with intermediate steps $x_3$ (complete ordered list, "ce'o"; should include the relevant parent of $x_1$), where "first" is according to (partial) ordering rule $x_4$ (default: chronological order of birth per successive generation within the given lineage; other restrictions on legitimacy etc. may be specified here as well). Notes: The children of $x_2$ are possible candidates for $x_1$ due to trivial contraction of the relation. As an example: if Queen Elizabeth II of the UK/Commonwealth is $x_2$ and chronological order of birth for legitimate children (gender-neutral primogeniture on legitimate descent) is used as $x_4$, then the set of possible $x_1$s includes (and, as of 9 May A.D. 2019, is equal to the set of) all of the children of Elizabeth II, the legitimate children of her son Charles (William, Harry), and all of William's children (George, Charlotte, Louis); notice that the descendants of Elizabeth II not via Charles are excluded, as are any descendants not by William (including Harry's children); the next generation of possible $x_1$s will be (supposing that they come to exist) the children of George (the first-born legitimate son of William first-born legitimate son of Charles first-born legitimate son of Queen Elizabeth II) but not the descendants of William not by George; the fact that all of the intermediate steps are male is mere coincidence; this selbri in this example is a generalization of how the title "prince" is automatically bestowed in this line (excluding by marriage), at present, except for those who are granted princehood by virtue of being the children of the sons of the sovereign. See: "{pavmompazy'utka}". Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: child of primogenitic line, In Sense: Place Keywords: You can go to to see it.