Received: from [192.168.123.254] (port=37660 helo=jukni.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jCqZg-0006Bg-Gh for jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 13:06:31 -0700 Received: by jukni.digitalkingdom.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 13 Mar 2020 13:06:28 -0700 From: "Apache" To: curtis289@att.net Reply-To: webmaster@lojban.org Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word utkaro -- By krtisfranks Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 13:06:28 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_bar: -- In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a definition of "utkaro" in the language "English". Differences: 2,2c2,2 < $x_1$ and $x_2$ are path-linked by directed binary predicate $x_3$ (ka) via intermediate steps $x_4$ (ordered list; ce'o), such that no other node exists in the graph ($x_5$) to which $x_2$ is connected in the same way/direction as $x_1$ was indirectly connected to $x_2$ (id est: as being the first argument of the $x_3$). --- > $x_1$ and $x_2$ are path-linked by directed binary predicate $x_3$ (ka) via intermediate steps $x_4$ (ordered list; ce'o), such that no other node exists in the graph ($x_5$) to which $x_2$ is connected in the same way/direction (as being such that $x_2$ is the first argument of the $x_3$ and the hypothetical other node is the second argument thereof). Old Data: Definition: $x_1$ and $x_2$ are path-linked by directed binary predicate $x_3$ (ka) via intermediate steps $x_4$ (ordered list; ce'o), such that no other node exists in the graph ($x_5$) to which $x_2$ is connected in the same way/direction as $x_1$ was indirectly connected to $x_2$ (id est: as being the first argument of the $x_3$). Notes: $x_2$ is the root/leaf of the predicate (depending on point of view); it is the ultimate ancestor/descendent node in the graph along the path described by $x_4$ for $x_1$ using relation $x_3$. Not all combinations of $x_1$ nodes and $x_3$ relations and $x_4$ paths have such an $x_2$ node, nor is $x_2$ necessarily unique if only $x_1$ and $x_3$ are specified (the same is true if "$x_1$" and "$x_2$" are exchanged in this second clause of this sentence). Use a SE conversion or other permutation on the arguments of $x_3$ in order to change the perspective (for example: if we call $x_2$ a root, then it *might* be the case that $x_1$ is a leaf). In other words, $x_2$ is *an* ultimate ancestor/descendent of $x_1$, but not necessarily the only/unique one, nor necessarily the most distant one by any given metric (including graph geodesic distance). All other notes are the same as those for ".{utka}", which should be referenced. In order to make $x_1$ the ultimate node of the relationship in the other direction, exchange the order of the arguments in the predicate $x_3$ and then use "{se}" on this word. Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: ultimate path-linked ancestor node, In Sense: Place Keywords: New Data: Definition: $x_1$ and $x_2$ are path-linked by directed binary predicate $x_3$ (ka) via intermediate steps $x_4$ (ordered list; ce'o), such that no other node exists in the graph ($x_5$) to which $x_2$ is connected in the same way/direction (as being such that $x_2$ is the first argument of the $x_3$ and the hypothetical other node is the second argument thereof). Notes: $x_2$ is the root/leaf of the predicate (depending on point of view); it is the ultimate ancestor/descendent node in the graph along the path described by $x_4$ for $x_1$ using relation $x_3$. Not all combinations of $x_1$ nodes and $x_3$ relations and $x_4$ paths have such an $x_2$ node, nor is $x_2$ necessarily unique if only $x_1$ and $x_3$ are specified (the same is true if "$x_1$" and "$x_2$" are exchanged in this second clause of this sentence). Use a SE conversion or other permutation on the arguments of $x_3$ in order to change the perspective (for example: if we call $x_2$ a root, then it *might* be the case that $x_1$ is a leaf). In other words, $x_2$ is *an* ultimate ancestor/descendent of $x_1$, but not necessarily the only/unique one, nor necessarily the most distant one by any given metric (including graph geodesic distance). All other notes are the same as those for ".{utka}", which should be referenced. In order to make $x_1$ the ultimate node of the relationship in the other direction, exchange the order of the arguments in the predicate $x_3$ and then use "{se}" on this word. Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: ultimate path-linked ancestor node, In Sense: Place Keywords: You can go to to see it.