From: "Apache" <apache@digitalkingdom.org>
To: curtis289@att.net
Reply-To: webmaster@lojban.org
Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word dinso -- By krtisfranks
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 14:40:12 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <E1jfsAG-0007hB-Lz@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
X-Spam_score: -2.9
X-Spam_score_int: -28
X-Spam_bar: --


In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a
definition of "dinso" in the language "English".

Differences:

2,2c2,2
< 		$x_1$ is a dinosaur [very general: any ancient quasi-reptilian vertebrate or, possibly but probably not, modern bird] of type $x_2$ living in era $x_3$.
---
> 		$x_1$ is a 'dinosaur' [very general: any ancient quasi-reptilian vertebrate or, possibly but probably not, modern bird] of type $x_2$ living in era $x_3$.
5,5c5,5
< 		A gismu version of {dinsauru}; contrast with {rexsa} (in particular, this word probably would not but could refer to modern birds whereas {rexsa} can without any connotation to the contrary; meanwhile, {rexsa} cannot refer to pterodons vel sim. but this word can). The use of this word is not strictly only relevant to members of clade Dinosauria, although it does include them (and, specifically, modern birds, although it connotes ancientness and extinction unless it is part of am explicitly contrary context); its referent might also/alternatively include pterosaurs, icthyosaurs, plesiosaurs, mosasaurs, dimetrodons, avemetatarsaliads, and perhaps even other synapsids (in other words, any prehistoric quasi-reptilian vertebrate). As such, it is a qualitative word that bears no particular or strong attention or respect to genealogy or academic classification of these animals. Basically, any prehistoric animal the name of which ends in "-saur" can be so-described, as well as others. Proposed short rafsi: -dis-. See also: {rexsa}, {ketslau}, {ikfiio}, {disrmuzo}, {plesiio}.
---
> 		A gismu version of "{dinsauru}"; contrast with "{rexsa}" (in particular, this word probably would not but could refer to modern birds whereas "{rexsa}" can always do so without any connotation to the contrary; meanwhile, "{rexsa}" cannot refer to pterosaurs, ichthyosaurs, vel sim. but this word can). The use of this word is not strictly only relevant to members of clade Dinosauria, although it does include them (and, specifically, modern birds, although it connotes ancientness and extinction unless it is part of an explicitly contrary or general context); its referent might also/alternatively include pterosaurs, icthyosaurs, plesiosaurs, mosasaurs, dimetrodons, avemetatarsaliads, and perhaps even other ancient synapsids (in other words, any prehistoric quasi-reptilian vertebrate). As such, it is a qualitative word that bears no particular or strong attention or respect to genealogy, cladistics, taxology/taxonomy, or scientific/academic classification of these animals. Basically, any prehistoric animal the name of which ends in "-saur" can be so-described, as well as others. It probably should not reference more modern-like mammals proper. Proposed short rafsi: -dis-. See also: "{rexsa}", "{ketslau}", "{ikfiio}", {"disrmuzo}", "{plesiio}".
11a12,12
\n> 		Word: ancient quasi-reptilian vertebrate, In Sense: 


Old Data:

	Definition:
		$x_1$ is a dinosaur [very general: any ancient quasi-reptilian vertebrate or, possibly but probably not, modern bird] of type $x_2$ living in era $x_3$.

	Notes:
		A gismu version of {dinsauru}; contrast with {rexsa} (in particular, this word probably would not but could refer to modern birds whereas {rexsa} can without any connotation to the contrary; meanwhile, {rexsa} cannot refer to pterodons vel sim. but this word can). The use of this word is not strictly only relevant to members of clade Dinosauria, although it does include them (and, specifically, modern birds, although it connotes ancientness and extinction unless it is part of am explicitly contrary context); its referent might also/alternatively include pterosaurs, icthyosaurs, plesiosaurs, mosasaurs, dimetrodons, avemetatarsaliads, and perhaps even other synapsids (in other words, any prehistoric quasi-reptilian vertebrate). As such, it is a qualitative word that bears no particular or strong attention or respect to genealogy or academic classification of these animals. Basically, any prehistoric animal the name of which ends in "-saur" can be so-described, as well as others. Proposed short rafsi: -dis-. See also: {rexsa}, {ketslau}, {ikfiio}, {disrmuzo}, {plesiio}.

	Jargon:
		

	Gloss Keywords:
		Word: dinosaur, In Sense: completely general

	Place Keywords:


New Data:

	Definition:
		$x_1$ is a 'dinosaur' [very general: any ancient quasi-reptilian vertebrate or, possibly but probably not, modern bird] of type $x_2$ living in era $x_3$.

	Notes:
		A gismu version of "{dinsauru}"; contrast with "{rexsa}" (in particular, this word probably would not but could refer to modern birds whereas "{rexsa}" can always do so without any connotation to the contrary; meanwhile, "{rexsa}" cannot refer to pterosaurs, ichthyosaurs, vel sim. but this word can). The use of this word is not strictly only relevant to members of clade Dinosauria, although it does include them (and, specifically, modern birds, although it connotes ancientness and extinction unless it is part of an explicitly contrary or general context); its referent might also/alternatively include pterosaurs, icthyosaurs, plesiosaurs, mosasaurs, dimetrodons, avemetatarsaliads, and perhaps even other ancient synapsids (in other words, any prehistoric quasi-reptilian vertebrate). As such, it is a qualitative word that bears no particular or strong attention or respect to genealogy, cladistics, taxology/taxonomy, or scientific/academic classification of these animals. Basically, any prehistoric animal the name of which ends in "-saur" can be so-described, as well as others. It probably should not reference more modern-like mammals proper. Proposed short rafsi: -dis-. See also: "{rexsa}", "{ketslau}", "{ikfiio}", {"disrmuzo}", "{plesiio}".

	Jargon:
		

	Gloss Keywords:
		Word: dinosaur, In Sense: completely general
		Word: ancient quasi-reptilian vertebrate, In Sense: 

	Place Keywords:


You can go to <http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/dict/dinso> to see it.