Received: from [192.168.123.254] (port=54106 helo=jukni.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jfsBv-0007nS-1N for jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 14:41:57 -0700 Received: by jukni.digitalkingdom.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 01 Jun 2020 14:41:55 -0700 From: "Apache" To: curtis289@att.net Reply-To: webmaster@lojban.org Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word dinso -- By krtisfranks Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 14:41:54 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_bar: -- In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a definition of "dinso" in the language "English". Differences: 5,5c5,5 < A gismu version of "{dinsauru}"; contrast with "{rexsa}" (in particular, this word probably would not but could refer to modern birds whereas "{rexsa}" can always do so without any connotation to the contrary; meanwhile, "{rexsa}" cannot refer to pterosaurs, ichthyosaurs, vel sim. but this word can). The use of this word is not strictly only relevant to members of clade Dinosauria, although it does include them (and, specifically, modern birds, although it connotes ancientness and extinction unless it is part of an explicitly contrary or general context); its referent might also/alternatively include pterosaurs, icthyosaurs, plesiosaurs, mosasaurs, dimetrodons, avemetatarsaliads, and perhaps even other ancient synapsids (in other words, any prehistoric quasi-reptilian vertebrate). As such, it is a qualitative word that bears no particular or strong attention or respect to genealogy, cladistics, taxology/taxonomy, or scientific/academic classification of these animals. Basically, any prehistoric animal the name of which ends in "-saur" can be so-described, as well as others. It probably should not reference more modern-like mammals proper. Proposed short rafsi: -dis-. See also: "{rexsa}", "{ketslau}", "{ikfiio}", {"disrmuzo}", "{plesiio}". --- > A gismu version of "{dinsauru}"; contrast with "{rexsa}" (in particular, this word probably would not but could refer to modern birds whereas "{rexsa}" can always do so without any connotation to the contrary; meanwhile, "{rexsa}" cannot refer to pterosaurs, ichthyosaurs, vel sim. but this word can). The use of this word is not strictly only relevant to members of clade Dinosauria, although it does include them (and, specifically, modern birds, although it connotes ancientness and extinction unless it is part of an explicitly contrary or general context); its referent might also/alternatively include pterosaurs, icthyosaurs, plesiosaurs, mosasaurs, dimetrodons, avemetatarsaliads, and perhaps even other ancient synapsids (in other words, any prehistoric quasi-reptilian vertebrate). As such, it is a qualitative word that bears no particular or strong attention or respect to genealogy, cladistics, taxology/taxonomy, or scientific/academic classification of these animals. Basically, any prehistoric animal the name of which ends in "-saur" can be so-described, as well as others. It probably should not reference more modern-like mammals proper. Proposed short rafsi: -dis-. See also: "{rexsa}", "{ketslau}", "{ikfiio}", "{disrmuzo}", "{plesiio}". 11,11d10 < Word: dinosaur, In Sense: completely general \n12a12,12 \n> Word: dinosaur, In Sense: completely general Old Data: Definition: $x_1$ is a 'dinosaur' [very general: any ancient quasi-reptilian vertebrate or, possibly but probably not, modern bird] of type $x_2$ living in era $x_3$. Notes: A gismu version of "{dinsauru}"; contrast with "{rexsa}" (in particular, this word probably would not but could refer to modern birds whereas "{rexsa}" can always do so without any connotation to the contrary; meanwhile, "{rexsa}" cannot refer to pterosaurs, ichthyosaurs, vel sim. but this word can). The use of this word is not strictly only relevant to members of clade Dinosauria, although it does include them (and, specifically, modern birds, although it connotes ancientness and extinction unless it is part of an explicitly contrary or general context); its referent might also/alternatively include pterosaurs, icthyosaurs, plesiosaurs, mosasaurs, dimetrodons, avemetatarsaliads, and perhaps even other ancient synapsids (in other words, any prehistoric quasi-reptilian vertebrate). As such, it is a qualitative word that bears no particular or strong attention or respect to genealogy, cladistics, taxology/taxonomy, or scientific/academic classification of these animals. Basically, any prehistoric animal the name of which ends in "-saur" can be so-described, as well as others. It probably should not reference more modern-like mammals proper. Proposed short rafsi: -dis-. See also: "{rexsa}", "{ketslau}", "{ikfiio}", {"disrmuzo}", "{plesiio}". Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: dinosaur, In Sense: completely general Word: ancient quasi-reptilian vertebrate, In Sense: Place Keywords: New Data: Definition: $x_1$ is a 'dinosaur' [very general: any ancient quasi-reptilian vertebrate or, possibly but probably not, modern bird] of type $x_2$ living in era $x_3$. Notes: A gismu version of "{dinsauru}"; contrast with "{rexsa}" (in particular, this word probably would not but could refer to modern birds whereas "{rexsa}" can always do so without any connotation to the contrary; meanwhile, "{rexsa}" cannot refer to pterosaurs, ichthyosaurs, vel sim. but this word can). The use of this word is not strictly only relevant to members of clade Dinosauria, although it does include them (and, specifically, modern birds, although it connotes ancientness and extinction unless it is part of an explicitly contrary or general context); its referent might also/alternatively include pterosaurs, icthyosaurs, plesiosaurs, mosasaurs, dimetrodons, avemetatarsaliads, and perhaps even other ancient synapsids (in other words, any prehistoric quasi-reptilian vertebrate). As such, it is a qualitative word that bears no particular or strong attention or respect to genealogy, cladistics, taxology/taxonomy, or scientific/academic classification of these animals. Basically, any prehistoric animal the name of which ends in "-saur" can be so-described, as well as others. It probably should not reference more modern-like mammals proper. Proposed short rafsi: -dis-. See also: "{rexsa}", "{ketslau}", "{ikfiio}", "{disrmuzo}", "{plesiio}". Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: ancient quasi-reptilian vertebrate, In Sense: Word: dinosaur, In Sense: completely general Place Keywords: You can go to to see it.