Received: from [192.168.123.254] (port=39062 helo=db.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kppBJ-00C0Gu-1K for jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 01:02:48 -0800 Received: by db.digitalkingdom.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 17 Dec 2020 09:02:40 +0000 From: "Apache" To: curtis289@att.net Reply-To: webmaster@lojban.org Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word uaigri -- By krtisfranks Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 09:02:40 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_bar: -- In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a definition of "uaigri" in the language "English". Differences: 2,2c2,2 < $x_1$ is a future but not current $x_2$ as of time $x_3$ according to standard $x_4$; $x_1$ is a soon-to-be-$x_2$; $x_1$ is an example of an $x_2$-apparent. --- > $x_1$ is a future but not current/eventual $x_2$ as of time $x_3$ according to standard $x_4$; $x_1$ is a soon-to-be-$x_2$; $x_1$ is an example of an $x_2$-apparent. 12a13,13 \n> Word: eventual, In Sense: future but not present/current Old Data: Definition: $x_1$ is a future but not current $x_2$ as of time $x_3$ according to standard $x_4$; $x_1$ is a soon-to-be-$x_2$; $x_1$ is an example of an $x_2$-apparent. Notes: Actual soonness is not implied; that wording is just an artifact of English translation. $x_2$ should be a role or possession of a property; unless $x_1$ is an or could be an event, it should not be one either (more generally, they have to match type in a sense). Use of this word is, inherently, a prediction about the future; $x_4$ is not the standard by which the expectation/prediction is presently made but by which anyone/anything next becoming an $x_2$ would/will be judged. $x_4$ is the standard by which $x_2$ will be claimed (to be) but by which $x_2$ is claimed to currently not be; commencement/assumption of the state of being an example of an $x_2$ must occur in the future but must still (in the present) not apply. It may have been true of/possessed in in the past, but this case is not considered, under normal circumstances, to be resumptive: the state may have been done/terminated (but not necessarily finished) but definitely/regardlessly will be started anew. This word is good for the titles "President-elect", "heir-apparent", and "crown-prince". See also: ".{eikse}". Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: -apparent, In Sense: Word: future, In Sense: but not present Place Keywords: New Data: Definition: $x_1$ is a future but not current/eventual $x_2$ as of time $x_3$ according to standard $x_4$; $x_1$ is a soon-to-be-$x_2$; $x_1$ is an example of an $x_2$-apparent. Notes: Actual soonness is not implied; that wording is just an artifact of English translation. $x_2$ should be a role or possession of a property; unless $x_1$ is an or could be an event, it should not be one either (more generally, they have to match type in a sense). Use of this word is, inherently, a prediction about the future; $x_4$ is not the standard by which the expectation/prediction is presently made but by which anyone/anything next becoming an $x_2$ would/will be judged. $x_4$ is the standard by which $x_2$ will be claimed (to be) but by which $x_2$ is claimed to currently not be; commencement/assumption of the state of being an example of an $x_2$ must occur in the future but must still (in the present) not apply. It may have been true of/possessed in in the past, but this case is not considered, under normal circumstances, to be resumptive: the state may have been done/terminated (but not necessarily finished) but definitely/regardlessly will be started anew. This word is good for the titles "President-elect", "heir-apparent", and "crown-prince". See also: ".{eikse}". Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: -apparent, In Sense: Word: future, In Sense: but not present Word: eventual, In Sense: future but not present/current Place Keywords: You can go to to see it.