Return-path: Envelope-to: jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org Delivery-date: Sat, 05 Jun 2021 02:47:52 -0700 Received: from [192.168.123.254] (port=60850 helo=web.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1lpSuB-002bhE-JJ for jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org; Sat, 05 Jun 2021 02:47:52 -0700 Received: by web.digitalkingdom.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 05 Jun 2021 09:47:47 +0000 From: "Apache" To: curtis289@att.net Reply-To: webmaster@lojban.org Subject: [jvsw] Definition Added At Word dzu'enba -- By krtisfranks Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2021 09:47:47 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.3 X-Spam_score_int: -22 X-Spam_bar: -- In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has added a definition of "dzu'enba" in the language "English". New Data: Definition: $x_1$ and $x_2$ are mutual sibling nodes in a directed tree graph $x_6$ such that their shared parent node(s) $x_5$ is/are the most-recent common direct ancestor of $x_3$ and $x_4$, such that $x_1$ is a direct ancestor of or simply is $x_3$ (as the case may be), and such that $x_2$ is a direct ancestor of or simply is $x_4$ (as the case may be), all according to tree ordering relation $x_7$. Notes: $x_3$ and $x_4$ must be distinct nodes in the same directed tree; else this relationship is undefined. If $x_3$ is a direct ancestor of $x_4$, or vice-versa, then this relationship is – again – undefined. $x_6$ and $x_7$ define the relations/standards which are being applied. This word may be used in reference to non-familial tree graphs via analogy, despite references to 'siblings' etc. See also: "{tunba}", "{dzena}", "{tseingu}". Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: most-recent mutual-sibling direct ancestors, In Sense: Word: sibling branch progenitors, In Sense: Place Keywords: You can go to to see it.