Return-path: Envelope-to: jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org Delivery-date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 20:59:46 -0700 Received: from [192.168.123.254] (port=37206 helo=jiten.lojban.org) by 36792b12ac38 with smtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mdliZ-000wS4-MC for jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 20:59:46 -0700 Received: by jiten.lojban.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 22 Oct 2021 03:59:43 +0000 From: "Apache" To: curtis289@att.net Reply-To: webmaster@lojban.org Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word zei'o -- By krtisfranks Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 03:59:43 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_bar: -- In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a definition of "zei'o" in the language "English". Differences: 5,5c5,5 < Use SE in order to reorder the sumti slots. Typically, the word in question should be a non-cmavo brivla, but this is not always the case. When used as a rafsi, it modifies the last veljvo and deletes all except the first n sumti slots (regardless of any inferred relations between them and the sumti slots of other companion veljvo, or of any implied filling (unless such is actually explicit)); in rafsi form, the subscript is implied to be 1 (meaning that all except the first sumti slot is deleted) unless explicitly specified otherwise, else veljvo structure no longer makes much sense; the subscript marker "{xi}" (proposed rafsi: "-xix-") is required for explicit specification of the subscript unless there is a veljvo bracket or tanru-grouping modifier (such as "{ke'e}") which makes such interpretation the only possible option from a syntactic, semantic, AND practical standpoint. --- > Use SE in order to reorder the sumti slots. Typically, the word in question should be a non-cmavo brivla, but this is not always the case. When used as a rafsi, it modifies the last veljvo and deletes all except the first n sumti slots (regardless of any inferred relations between them and the sumti slots of other companion veljvo, or of any implied filling (unless such is actually explicit)); in rafsi form, the subscript is implied to be 1 (meaning that all except the first sumti slot is deleted) unless explicitly specified otherwise, else veljvo structure no longer makes much sense; the subscript marker "{xi}" (proposed rafsi: "-xix-") is required for explicit specification of the subscript unless there is a veljvo bracket or tanru-grouping modifier (such as "{ke'e}") which makes such interpretation the only possible option from a syntactic, semantic, AND practical standpoint. Proposed rafsi: "-zes-" (because the last letteral for it should be able to cluster tightly with "-xix-"). Old Data: Definition: Delete all sumti slots of the immediately preceding word which are not explicitly filled excepting the first n (specified by subscript; contextless default: n=0). Notes: Use SE in order to reorder the sumti slots. Typically, the word in question should be a non-cmavo brivla, but this is not always the case. When used as a rafsi, it modifies the last veljvo and deletes all except the first n sumti slots (regardless of any inferred relations between them and the sumti slots of other companion veljvo, or of any implied filling (unless such is actually explicit)); in rafsi form, the subscript is implied to be 1 (meaning that all except the first sumti slot is deleted) unless explicitly specified otherwise, else veljvo structure no longer makes much sense; the subscript marker "{xi}" (proposed rafsi: "-xix-") is required for explicit specification of the subscript unless there is a veljvo bracket or tanru-grouping modifier (such as "{ke'e}") which makes such interpretation the only possible option from a syntactic, semantic, AND practical standpoint. Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: delete all except the first n unfilled sumti slots, In Sense: Place Keywords: New Data: Definition: Delete all sumti slots of the immediately preceding word which are not explicitly filled excepting the first n (specified by subscript; contextless default: n=0). Notes: Use SE in order to reorder the sumti slots. Typically, the word in question should be a non-cmavo brivla, but this is not always the case. When used as a rafsi, it modifies the last veljvo and deletes all except the first n sumti slots (regardless of any inferred relations between them and the sumti slots of other companion veljvo, or of any implied filling (unless such is actually explicit)); in rafsi form, the subscript is implied to be 1 (meaning that all except the first sumti slot is deleted) unless explicitly specified otherwise, else veljvo structure no longer makes much sense; the subscript marker "{xi}" (proposed rafsi: "-xix-") is required for explicit specification of the subscript unless there is a veljvo bracket or tanru-grouping modifier (such as "{ke'e}") which makes such interpretation the only possible option from a syntactic, semantic, AND practical standpoint. Proposed rafsi: "-zes-" (because the last letteral for it should be able to cluster tightly with "-xix-"). Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: delete all except the first n unfilled sumti slots, In Sense: Place Keywords: You can go to to see it.