Return-path: Envelope-to: jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 19:48:38 -0700 Received: from [192.168.123.254] (port=40730 helo=web.lojban.org) by d58c2cd1180d with smtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1pnVxr-002Zru-JE for jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 19:48:38 -0700 Received: by web.lojban.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 15 Apr 2023 02:48:35 +0000 From: "Apache" To: curtis289@att.net Reply-To: webmaster@lojban.org Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word utkazo -- By krtisfranks Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2023 02:48:35 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.0 X-Spam_score_int: -9 X-Spam_bar: - In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a definition of "utkazo" in the language "English". Differences: 2,2c2,2 < $x_1$ and $x_2$ are path-linked by binary predicate $x_3$ (ka) via intermediate steps $x_4$ (ce'o; (ordered) list but not necessarily fully specified without skipping/gaps). --- > $x_1$ and $x_2$ are path-linked by binary predicate $x_3$ (ka) via intermediate steps $x_4$ (ce'o; (ordered) list but not necessarily fully and explicitly specified without skipping/gaps/omissions/implicit terms). 5,5c5,5 < This word is basically the same ".{utka}" in terms of its meaning, but partial specification of $x_4$ does not imply complete specification of $x_4$; there may be skipped/elided/implicit terms between those which are specified, possibly including either between $x_1$ and the first-specified term of $x_4$ or between the last-specified term of $x_4$ and $x_2$. Like ".{utka}", neither acyclicity nor geodesicity is implied, but furthermore: any cycles or off-geodesic path-walking may occur in the omitted/implicit terms of $x_4$. It is not guaranteed that between any two explicit terms of $x_4$ (or between the endpoint terms and $x_1$ or $x_2$ respectively) there are any gaps/missing/implicit terms - only the possibility of such is implied. --- > This word is basically the same as ".{utka}" in terms of its meaning, but partial explicit specification of $x_4$ does not imply complete specification of $x_4$; there may be skipped/elided/implicit terms between those which are specified, possibly including either between $x_1$ and the first-specified term of $x_4$ or between the last-specified term of $x_4$ and $x_2$. Like ".{utka}", neither acyclicity nor geodesicity is implied, but furthermore: any cycles or off-geodesic path-walking/paths may possibly-also occur in/via/at/with or partially in/via/at/with the omitted/implicit terms of $x_4$. It is not guaranteed/necessary that between any two explicit terms of $x_4$ (or between the endpoint terms thereof and either $x_1$ or $x_2$ respectively) there are any gaps/missing/implicit terms - only the possibility of such is implied/allowed by (the usage of) this word. Old Data: Definition: $x_1$ and $x_2$ are path-linked by binary predicate $x_3$ (ka) via intermediate steps $x_4$ (ce'o; (ordered) list but not necessarily fully specified without skipping/gaps). Notes: This word is basically the same ".{utka}" in terms of its meaning, but partial specification of $x_4$ does not imply complete specification of $x_4$; there may be skipped/elided/implicit terms between those which are specified, possibly including either between $x_1$ and the first-specified term of $x_4$ or between the last-specified term of $x_4$ and $x_2$. Like ".{utka}", neither acyclicity nor geodesicity is implied, but furthermore: any cycles or off-geodesic path-walking may occur in the omitted/implicit terms of $x_4$. It is not guaranteed that between any two explicit terms of $x_4$ (or between the endpoint terms and $x_1$ or $x_2$ respectively) there are any gaps/missing/implicit terms - only the possibility of such is implied. Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: .utka but possibly with gaps, In Sense: Place Keywords: New Data: Definition: $x_1$ and $x_2$ are path-linked by binary predicate $x_3$ (ka) via intermediate steps $x_4$ (ce'o; (ordered) list but not necessarily fully and explicitly specified without skipping/gaps/omissions/implicit terms). Notes: This word is basically the same as ".{utka}" in terms of its meaning, but partial explicit specification of $x_4$ does not imply complete specification of $x_4$; there may be skipped/elided/implicit terms between those which are specified, possibly including either between $x_1$ and the first-specified term of $x_4$ or between the last-specified term of $x_4$ and $x_2$. Like ".{utka}", neither acyclicity nor geodesicity is implied, but furthermore: any cycles or off-geodesic path-walking/paths may possibly-also occur in/via/at/with or partially in/via/at/with the omitted/implicit terms of $x_4$. It is not guaranteed/necessary that between any two explicit terms of $x_4$ (or between the endpoint terms thereof and either $x_1$ or $x_2$ respectively) there are any gaps/missing/implicit terms - only the possibility of such is implied/allowed by (the usage of) this word. Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: .utka but possibly with gaps, In Sense: Place Keywords: You can go to to see it.