From www-data@oh-www1.lojban.org Tue Apr 20 20:45:13 2010 Received: from 128-177-28-49.ip.openhosting.com ([128.177.28.49] helo=oh-www1.lojban.org) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1O4Qs9-000133-2e; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 20:45:13 -0700 Received: from www-data by oh-www1.lojban.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1O4Qs7-0004W8-BD; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 23:45:07 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 23:45:07 -0400 Message-Id: To: MTurniansky@gmail.com Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word ticta'u -- By donri Content-type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8 From: www-data X-Spam_score: 2.5 X-Spam_score_int: 25 X-Spam_bar: ++ X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "chain.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: In jbovlaste, the user donri has edited a definition of "ticta'u" in the language "English". Differences: 2,2c2,2 < $ta_1$ is a disguise/camouflage worn by $ta_2$ to deceive $tc_2$ into $tc_3$ --- > $ta_1$ is a disguise/camouflage worn by $ta_2$ to deceive $tc_2$ into $tc_3$. 5,5c5,5 < The implied tc1 is the event of x2 wearing x1 . The implied ta3 is deceiving x3 into x4. --- > The implied $tc_1$ is the event of $ta_2$ wearing $ta_1$. The implied $ta_3$ is deceiving $tc_2 into $tc_3$. 10a11,11 \n> Word: camouflage, In Sense: clothing 12,12d12 < Word: mask, In Sense: disguise \n14,14c14,14 < Word: camouflage, In Sense: clothing --- > Word: mask, In Sense: disguise [...] Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.7 TVD_RCVD_IP TVD_RCVD_IP 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4997] 1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 0.0 TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP In jbovlaste, the user donri has edited a definition of "ticta'u" in the language "English". Differences: 2,2c2,2 < $ta_1$ is a disguise/camouflage worn by $ta_2$ to deceive $tc_2$ into $tc_3$ --- > $ta_1$ is a disguise/camouflage worn by $ta_2$ to deceive $tc_2$ into $tc_3$. 5,5c5,5 < The implied tc1 is the event of x2 wearing x1 . The implied ta3 is deceiving x3 into x4. --- > The implied $tc_1$ is the event of $ta_2$ wearing $ta_1$. The implied $ta_3$ is deceiving $tc_2 into $tc_3$. 10a11,11 \n> Word: camouflage, In Sense: clothing 12,12d12 < Word: mask, In Sense: disguise \n14,14c14,14 < Word: camouflage, In Sense: clothing --- > Word: mask, In Sense: disguise Old Data: Definition: $ta_1$ is a disguise/camouflage worn by $ta_2$ to deceive $tc_2$ into $tc_3$ Notes: The implied tc1 is the event of x2 wearing x1 . The implied ta3 is deceiving x3 into x4. Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: disguise, In Sense: clothing Word: mask, In Sense: disguise Word: guise, In Sense: clothing Word: camouflage, In Sense: clothing Place Keywords: Word: disguise, In Sense: clothing, For Place: 1 Word: disguised, In Sense: , For Place: 2 New Data: Definition: $ta_1$ is a disguise/camouflage worn by $ta_2$ to deceive $tc_2$ into $tc_3$. Notes: The implied $tc_1$ is the event of $ta_2$ wearing $ta_1$. The implied $ta_3$ is deceiving $tc_2 into $tc_3$. Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: camouflage, In Sense: clothing Word: disguise, In Sense: clothing Word: guise, In Sense: clothing Word: mask, In Sense: disguise Place Keywords: Word: disguise, In Sense: clothing, For Place: 1 Word: disguised, In Sense: , For Place: 2 You can go to to see it.