From www-data@oh-www1.lojban.org Sat Jun 19 04:08:48 2010 Received: from 128-177-28-49.ip.openhosting.com ([128.177.28.49] helo=oh-www1.lojban.org) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OPvuk-0001GQ-EO; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 04:08:48 -0700 Received: from www-data by oh-www1.lojban.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1OPvuj-0001jT-3Y; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 07:08:41 -0400 Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 07:08:41 -0400 Message-Id: To: daniel@brockman.se Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word le'ai -- By daniel Content-type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8 From: www-data X-Spam_score: 2.5 X-Spam_score_int: 25 X-Spam_bar: ++ X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "chain.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: In jbovlaste, the user daniel has edited a definition of "le'ai" in the language "English". Differences: 5,5c5,7 < The {lo'ai} ... {sa'ai} ... {le'ai} replacement construct asks the listener to replace the text after {lo'ai} with the text after {sa'ai}. The order {sa'ai} ... {lo'ai} ... {le'ai} is also allowed, and either or both parts can be omitted and thus left up to context. When both parts are omitted, the word {le'ai} on its own indicates that a mistake was made while leaving all the details up to context. --- > The {lo'ai} ... {sa'ai} ... {le'ai} replacement construct asks the listener to replace the text after {lo'ai} with the text after {sa'ai}. The order {sa'ai} ... {lo'ai} ... {le'ai} is also allowed, and either or both parts can be omitted and thus left up to context. When both parts are omitted, the word {le'ai} on its own indicates that a mistake was made while leaving all the details up to context. > > It is also possible to attach SAI to a le'ai construct: le'ai {dai} (or le'ai {da'oi} ko'a) indicates that someone else made a mistake; le'ai {pei} asks whether someone else made a mistake; and {sai}, {ru'e} and {cu'i} can be used to indicate the importance of the substitution. Furthermore, le'ai {nai} can be used to explicitly deny mistakes instead of acknowledging them (compare "sic"). 11,11d12 < Word: mistake indicator, In Sense: \n13a15,17 \n> Word: mistake indicator, In Sense: > Word: sorry, In Sense: after saying something wrong > Word: sic, In Sense: [...] Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.7 TVD_RCVD_IP TVD_RCVD_IP 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] 1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 0.0 TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP To: misformatted and dynamic rDNS In jbovlaste, the user daniel has edited a definition of "le'ai" in the language "English". Differences: 5,5c5,7 < The {lo'ai} ... {sa'ai} ... {le'ai} replacement construct asks the listener to replace the text after {lo'ai} with the text after {sa'ai}. The order {sa'ai} ... {lo'ai} ... {le'ai} is also allowed, and either or both parts can be omitted and thus left up to context. When both parts are omitted, the word {le'ai} on its own indicates that a mistake was made while leaving all the details up to context. --- > The {lo'ai} ... {sa'ai} ... {le'ai} replacement construct asks the listener to replace the text after {lo'ai} with the text after {sa'ai}. The order {sa'ai} ... {lo'ai} ... {le'ai} is also allowed, and either or both parts can be omitted and thus left up to context. When both parts are omitted, the word {le'ai} on its own indicates that a mistake was made while leaving all the details up to context. > > It is also possible to attach SAI to a le'ai construct: le'ai {dai} (or le'ai {da'oi} ko'a) indicates that someone else made a mistake; le'ai {pei} asks whether someone else made a mistake; and {sai}, {ru'e} and {cu'i} can be used to indicate the importance of the substitution. Furthermore, le'ai {nai} can be used to explicitly deny mistakes instead of acknowledging them (compare "sic"). 11,11d12 < Word: mistake indicator, In Sense: \n13a15,17 \n> Word: mistake indicator, In Sense: > Word: sorry, In Sense: after saying something wrong > Word: sic, In Sense: Old Data: Definition: replace recent mistakenly uttered text Notes: The {lo'ai} ... {sa'ai} ... {le'ai} replacement construct asks the listener to replace the text after {lo'ai} with the text after {sa'ai}. The order {sa'ai} ... {lo'ai} ... {le'ai} is also allowed, and either or both parts can be omitted and thus left up to context. When both parts are omitted, the word {le'ai} on its own indicates that a mistake was made while leaving all the details up to context. Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: mistake indicator, In Sense: Word: end mistake quote, In Sense: Word: end replacement quote, In Sense: Place Keywords: New Data: Definition: replace recent mistakenly uttered text Notes: The {lo'ai} ... {sa'ai} ... {le'ai} replacement construct asks the listener to replace the text after {lo'ai} with the text after {sa'ai}. The order {sa'ai} ... {lo'ai} ... {le'ai} is also allowed, and either or both parts can be omitted and thus left up to context. When both parts are omitted, the word {le'ai} on its own indicates that a mistake was made while leaving all the details up to context. It is also possible to attach SAI to a le'ai construct: le'ai {dai} (or le'ai {da'oi} ko'a) indicates that someone else made a mistake; le'ai {pei} asks whether someone else made a mistake; and {sai}, {ru'e} and {cu'i} can be used to indicate the importance of the substitution. Furthermore, le'ai {nai} can be used to explicitly deny mistakes instead of acknowledging them (compare "sic"). Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: end mistake quote, In Sense: Word: end replacement quote, In Sense: Word: mistake indicator, In Sense: Word: sorry, In Sense: after saying something wrong Word: sic, In Sense: Place Keywords: You can go to to see it.