From www-data@oh-www1.lojban.org Tue Apr 05 16:43:40 2011 Received: from 128-177-28-49.ip.openhosting.com ([128.177.28.49] helo=oh-www1.lojban.org) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7FuJ-00017m-98 for jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:43:40 -0700 Received: from www-data by oh-www1.lojban.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7FuI-0005SQ-KP for jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 19:43:34 -0400 Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 19:43:34 -0400 Message-Id: Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word seldau -- By totus Content-type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8 From: www-data X-Spam_score: 0.8 X-Spam_score_int: 8 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "chain.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: In jbovlaste, the user totus has edited a definition of "seldau" in the language "English". Differences: 2,2c2,2 < $x_{1}$ is an argued for with argue $x_{2}$ with argued against $x_{3}$. --- > $d_2$ is the position/stand taken by $d_1$ arguing against position/stand $d_3$. 5,5c5,5 < --- > Cf. {darlu}. 11,11c11,12 < Word: argued for, In Sense: --- > Word: position , In Sense: taken in arguement > Word: stand, In Sense: taken in arguement [...] Content analysis details: (0.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.7 TVD_RCVD_IP TVD_RCVD_IP 1.0 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS In jbovlaste, the user totus has edited a definition of "seldau" in the language "English". Differences: 2,2c2,2 < $x_{1}$ is an argued for with argue $x_{2}$ with argued against $x_{3}$. --- > $d_2$ is the position/stand taken by $d_1$ arguing against position/stand $d_3$. 5,5c5,5 < --- > Cf. {darlu}. 11,11c11,12 < Word: argued for, In Sense: --- > Word: position , In Sense: taken in arguement > Word: stand, In Sense: taken in arguement Old Data: Definition: $x_{1}$ is an argued for with argue $x_{2}$ with argued against $x_{3}$. Notes: Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: argued for, In Sense: Place Keywords: New Data: Definition: $d_2$ is the position/stand taken by $d_1$ arguing against position/stand $d_3$. Notes: Cf. {darlu}. Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: position , In Sense: taken in arguement Word: stand, In Sense: taken in arguement Place Keywords: You can go to to see it.