Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 23:14:26 -0700
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
Message-ID: <20120520061425.GL3745@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
References: <CAKOEKkRF+--nb4U_qijbH=_D5KyLbm8yLqjsFwXUZKZDXEy9mg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAKOEKkRF+--nb4U_qijbH=_D5KyLbm8yLqjsFwXUZKZDXEy9mg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: Re: [jbovlaste] finpe definition -- sharks?
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: jbovlaste-bounces@lojban.org

This goes at http://www.lojban.org/tiki/BPFK+Section%3A+gismu+Issues
, please.

-Robin

On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 09:53:44AM -0400, Michael Turniansky wrote:
>   According to jbovlaste, finpe is "x1 is a fish of species
> x2[metaphorical extension to sharks, non-fish aquatic vertebrates]."
>  "Metaphorical extension to sharks..."?  Ummm.. sharks* are* fish
> (cartilaginous ones, yes, but fish nonetheless), so it seems that "sharks"
> should be taken out of that parenthetical, unless you want to change the
> main definition from "fish" to "Osteichthyans".  But no one wants that, do
> they?
>           --gejyspa

> _______________________________________________
> jbovlaste mailing list
> jbovlaste@lojban.org
> http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/jbovlaste


-- 
http://singinst.org/ :  Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
.i ko na cpedu lo nu stidi vau loi jbopre .i danfu lu na go'i li'u .e
lu go'i li'u .i ji'a go'i lu na'e go'i li'u .e lu go'i na'i li'u .e
lu no'e go'i li'u .e lu to'e go'i li'u .e lu lo mamta be do cu sofybakni li'u

_______________________________________________
jbovlaste mailing list
jbovlaste@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/jbovlaste