Received: from localhost ([::1]:58221 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Tr62K-0007gg-69; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 04:06:08 -0800 Received: from mail-da0-f43.google.com ([209.85.210.43]:38357) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Tr628-0007gb-Nb for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 04:06:03 -0800 Received: by mail-da0-f43.google.com with SMTP id u36so7457345dak.2 for ; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 04:05:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=448p5g4mYkEX5MeN+4Q5LxqgB99zrzrW+MyVrFFDZ+c=; b=LlKm6oBYhAb2aHoVUqPUeT1SSlQGMcnO5dYeYMk4pzODDOm2XD3q/9NRKv5BswgKbD AkR8YjqmzY/HYj5NC36H/acPr/SFpqoHrFSdwiTqNfaDLln5sfFtNAlr2gS8lRvxRVlC INSPcEpVYs+5D5o2JfLoD2qZEBglmFKPhDtMQeqDpmTLLE+KJfFR9u5KYIC/2fLwYpV1 jEch4UFblWIBNUQpGRZcG3zG+NwaoycJxQTI52MrCKnfNGcb4UrSj/D4b+SqUAQ2Th1I GGIiFv7KGttb+IbpwOrRuZguxpgqSi+SQiTYRvVyTz48isYqG+DWsuhW4QfpoW3W+G9o wYzw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.211.42 with SMTP id mz10mr162927142pbc.100.1357301150314; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 04:05:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.233.225 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 04:05:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20130103201946.GA18038@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <2496675.noDcb1HzR9@caracal> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 09:05:50 -0300 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.9 X-Spam_score_int: 9 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I think the place structure of brabi'o should be: x1 becomes big/large in property/dimension(s) x2 (ka) [as compared with standard/norm x3] In general, for any broda, the place structure of rodbi'o should be "x1 becomes broda [b2 b3 b4 ...]", i.e. all the suffix -bi'o does is change "is" to "becomes" in the place structure of broda. rodbi'o: ko'a binxo lo broda be ko'e bei ko'i bei ko'o ... [...] Content analysis details: (0.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jjllambias[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLY From and body contain different freemails Subject: Re: [jbovlaste] [eitanp32@gmail.com: {banro} gets default sense of "grow"; conflicting with some lujvo] X-BeenThere: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: jbovlaste@lojban.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: jbovlaste-bounces@lojban.org I think the place structure of brabi'o should be: x1 becomes big/large in property/dimension(s) x2 (ka) [as compared with standard/norm x3] In general, for any broda, the place structure of rodbi'o should be "x1 becomes broda [b2 b3 b4 ...]", i.e. all the suffix -bi'o does is change "is" to "becomes" in the place structure of broda. rodbi'o: ko'a binxo lo broda be ko'e bei ko'i bei ko'o ... Even if "brabi'o" and "banro" did have the same place structure though, I don't see what the big deal is. Lots of gismu have equivalent or near equivalent lujvo counterparts. mu'o mi'e xorxes _______________________________________________ jbovlaste mailing list jbovlaste@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/jbovlaste