Received: from localhost ([::1]:48169 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TsPlP-0004wu-2g; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 19:22:07 -0800 Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.120]:57977) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TsPlG-0004wp-Ed for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 19:22:04 -0800 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=VZd1zSV9 c=1 sm=0 a=sqYj6zCFaLTNQ95sbP+eeQ==:17 a=W3V8cEvdJLQA:10 a=JFaJvMoBDvMA:10 a=-FLk40605wMA:10 a=Yr05hP5UdKEA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=JNFw9bs7AAAA:8 a=dBrbwaExXbcA:10 a=YvGC-1XNRqY6cC9HhNUA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=sqYj6zCFaLTNQ95sbP+eeQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Authenticated-User: X-Originating-IP: 69.132.98.107 Received: from [69.132.98.107] ([69.132.98.107:39778] helo=chausie) by cdptpa-oedge03.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id F7/EE-05345-4D09BE05; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 03:21:57 +0000 Received: from caracal.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEB7D606A for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 22:21:56 -0500 (EST) From: Pierre Abbat To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 22:21:56 -0500 Message-ID: <3871498.YUkjVUDju2@caracal> User-Agent: KMail/4.8.5 (Linux/3.2.0-35-generic; KDE/4.8.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <20130103201946.GA18038@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Subject: Re: [jbovlaste] [eitanp32@gmail.com: {banro} gets default sense of "grow"; conflicting with some lujvo] X-BeenThere: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: jbovlaste@lojban.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: jbovlaste-bounces@lojban.org On Friday, January 04, 2013 09:05:50 Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote: > Even if "brabi'o" and "banro" did have the same place structure > though, I don't see what the big deal is. Lots of gismu have > equivalent or near equivalent lujvo counterparts. lo drata cu muvdu .ijo lo se drata cu klama fu zi'o mu'omi'e .pier. -- = sei do'anai mi'a djuno puze'e noroi nalselganse srera _______________________________________________ jbovlaste mailing list jbovlaste@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/jbovlaste