Received: from localhost ([::1]:43608 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TtpNt-000449-9l; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:55:41 -0800 Received: from mail-ee0-f48.google.com ([74.125.83.48]:45902) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TtpNl-000443-2d for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:55:39 -0800 Received: by mail-ee0-f48.google.com with SMTP id b57so1143314eek.35 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:55:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=hp6c2XK0VM1mNteThJC2Z6FEeu9JouDS2fYKt3ScRXo=; b=E5cSH1vUXpAnlN7VKLXjApNYCzKUrvOjYGF/iT+Jrsu/n9Qmasx1l/frAtfGsuaHN5 htFuQt4kZQxSVxZTsMsghBoy533z4AKPtYVJEVcfZjJdMCXw0Ed5gjYxVc49Uzv+4tL2 Ry5MgNrWU1kcHsx8AbJkoHWJstUOJdP022DgCEQiIyhCeSQ1/QVATHGMgdeioeoseJOo ZwQu3wvBGwGeAg/UXiJNrtdgvTremB7JMTbeIR5NZ/YcnC6NBvsfoz4SYRDeTTSzpTR+ 61/ucNI4PKSJLMGN1Xtxu01tkMH3F8V9STtd89JoZhyzbUPuZtCinPM4GY1mG/9Wmulo UdiQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.184.134 with SMTP id s6mr204750279eem.43.1357952125775; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:55:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.151.16 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:55:25 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 19:55:25 -0500 Message-ID: From: Eitan Postavsky To: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.2 X-Spam_score_int: 2 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: As per usual, here are some lujvo I'm thinking of coining, but first seeking approval (or disapproval): 1) zilmosycpina: the contact/rubbing between m2 and m3 is hair-raising/sets one's teeth on edge/squicks/gives the willies/heebie-jeebies through sense c2; m2 grides against m3. Example: lo'e jgalu lo'e bakryta'o cu tirna zilmosycpina ga'a ro ka'u remna Notes: This is an implicit-abstraction lujvo. The -zil- is there because I think the friction produced is irrelevant. zilmosycpina is a very subjective quality, so I'm not entirely happy with {zilmosycpina}, because it has no observer place. {zilmosycpina} is only used over plain {cpina} when unambiguous reference to /this particular type of unpleasant feeling/ is desired. [...] Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (eitanp32[at]gmail.com) 0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to DNSWL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [74.125.83.48 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit (eitanp32[at]gmail.com) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Subject: [jbovlaste] Gride sound, tip of the tongue, and missing a step on a staircase X-BeenThere: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: jbovlaste@lojban.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============9169034574967674981==" Errors-To: jbovlaste-bounces@lojban.org --===============9169034574967674981== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3a7ff8142f3c04d30cdee2 --047d7b3a7ff8142f3c04d30cdee2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 As per usual, here are some lujvo I'm thinking of coining, but first seeking approval (or disapproval): 1) zilmosycpina: the contact/rubbing between m2 and m3 is hair-raising/sets one's teeth on edge/squicks/gives the willies/heebie-jeebies through sense c2; m2 grides against m3. Example: lo'e jgalu lo'e bakryta'o cu tirna zilmosycpina ga'a ro ka'u remna Notes: This is an implicit-abstraction lujvo. The -zil- is there because I think the friction produced is irrelevant. zilmosycpina is a very subjective quality, so I'm not entirely happy with {zilmosycpina}, because it has no observer place. {zilmosycpina} is only used over plain {cpina} when unambiguous reference to /this particular type of unpleasant feeling/ is desired. 2) vlamo'itoi: t1 struggles to remember how to say/write/sign [express] word v1, almost but not quite getting it; v1 is at the tip of t1's tongue. Notes: This concept has a surprisingly hefty Wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tip_of_the_tongue 3) terserspaji: sp2 is surprised by step st3 while traversing stairs, surprised either that it exists or that it doesn't exist; sp2 unexpectedly hits floor when expecting to step on step st3; sp2 unexpectedly hits step st3 when expecting to step on floor. Example: le mamta be mi cu morsi .iri'abo terserspaji zo'onai Notes: If you've never terserspaji'd, e.g. because you can't walk, see http://www.answerbag.com/q_view/1232051 4) And finally, an experiment. Here's yet another of these lujvo: {selsnemojmo'i}. What meaning do you think I have in mind for it? --047d7b3a7ff8142f3c04d30cdee2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
As per usual, here are some lujvo I'm thinking of coin= ing, but first seeking approval (or disapproval):

1) zilmosycpina: t= he contact/rubbing between m2 and m3 is hair-raising/sets one's teeth o= n edge/squicks/gives the willies/heebie-jeebies through sense c2; m2 grides= against m3.
Example: lo'e jgalu lo'e bakryta'o cu tirna zilmosycpina ga'= ;a ro ka'u remna
Notes: This is an implicit-abstraction lujvo. The -= zil- is there because I think the friction produced is irrelevant. zilmosyc= pina is a very subjective quality, so I'm not entirely happy with {zilm= osycpina}, because it has no observer place. {zilmosycpina} is only used ov= er plain {cpina} when unambiguous reference to /this particular type of unp= leasant feeling/ is desired.

2) vlamo'itoi: t1 struggles to remember how to say/write/sign [expr= ess] word v1, almost but not quite getting it; v1 is at the tip of t1's= tongue.
Notes: This concept has a surprisingly hefty Wikipedia article:= http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tip_of_the_tongue

3) terserspaji: sp2 is surprised by step st3 while traversing = stairs, surprised either that it exists or that it doesn't exist; sp2 u= nexpectedly hits floor when expecting to step on step st3; sp2 unexpectedly= hits step st3 when expecting to step on floor.
Example: le mamta be mi cu morsi .iri'abo terserspaji zo'onai
N= otes: If you've never terserspaji'd, e.g. because you can't wal= k, see http://www.answerbag.com/q_view/1232051

4) And finally, an experiment. Here's yet another of these lujvo: {sels= nemojmo'i}. What meaning do you think I have in mind for it?
--047d7b3a7ff8142f3c04d30cdee2-- --===============9169034574967674981== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ jbovlaste mailing list jbovlaste@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/jbovlaste --===============9169034574967674981==--