Received: from localhost ([::1]:57798 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TzYzb-0008GO-9r; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 12:38:19 -0800 Received: from mail-qc0-f175.google.com ([209.85.216.175]:37107) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TzYzT-0008GI-RS for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 12:38:16 -0800 Received: by mail-qc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id j3so993901qcs.6 for ; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 12:38:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=vXPZ+l3y6M9nGX5NsVGZDWvrfC57aTIRUh/QzB6sTNk=; b=EY8JufVw4xdHZ85Y1jidB707TT4DiALQ8I2mqUivgxvYOTxdwSDwLRsWkpuBBsZpD3 tKKOWQ7oB2qb+YRwWQHP5U13BvLuSFljIuSkOVEnZniEjM76mwTQVPPzE4m5Xv/9bgz4 cNe9k8r7eQQQJ9lhsO47BkPHD17Z2jqdszNXhrZ+ipb4aoIFZ/CX0zp8edjV+RQnsY9e uc2B5iWnOLjgd/mEgwmh1dkTE06Wv/RHoVRcdaUJh4/DzhPDSxCnjhl+JihH5hfUZhI2 w/oQWp7nMF7H/ieGBAbTPx5y+yV9wWyUtNtx6R3/S6ZZIXb99JriOxIh8X7a8si3+iTg c7nQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.127.240 with SMTP id nj16mr15806200qeb.13.1359319085473; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 12:38:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.48.70 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 12:38:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 15:38:05 -0500 Message-ID: From: Eitan Postavsky To: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.2 X-Spam_score_int: 2 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: When you enter a word, it says "If it is a lujvo, make sure you're using the lowest scoring form of the lujvo. You're not going to get anywhere by using a different form, as the database is periodically swept for noncanonical form lujvo, and they are modified to the appropriate canonical form. (Or removed, and all related data pointed towards the canonical version, if it already exists.)". But {mumymasti} was entered in 2003 and survives, and its lowest scoring form is {mumyma'i}. Is the quoted message a bluff, then? heh. [...] Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (eitanp32[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit (eitanp32[at]gmail.com) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Subject: [jbovlaste] {mumymasti} prevails over {mumyma'i}; are lujvo not canonicalized? X-BeenThere: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: jbovlaste@lojban.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7890796407674137655==" Errors-To: jbovlaste-bounces@lojban.org --===============7890796407674137655== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6d962439e13904d44b238d --047d7b6d962439e13904d44b238d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 When you enter a word, it says "If it is a lujvo, make sure you're using the lowest scoring form of the lujvo. You're not going to get anywhere by using a different form, as the database is periodically swept for noncanonical form lujvo, and they are modified to the appropriate canonical form. (Or removed, and all related data pointed towards the canonical version, if it already exists.)". But {mumymasti} was entered in 2003 and survives, and its lowest scoring form is {mumyma'i}. Is the quoted message a bluff, then? heh. --047d7b6d962439e13904d44b238d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 When you enter a word, it says "If it is a lujvo, make sure you're using the lowest scoring form of the lujvo. You're not going to get anywhere by using a different form, as the database is periodically swept for noncanonical form lujvo, and they are modified to the appropriate canonical form. (Or removed, and all related data pointed towards the canonical version, if it already exists.)". But {mumymasti} was entered in 2003 and survives, and its lowest scoring form is {mumyma'i}. Is the quoted message a bluff, then? heh.
--047d7b6d962439e13904d44b238d-- --===============7890796407674137655== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ jbovlaste mailing list jbovlaste@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/jbovlaste --===============7890796407674137655==--