Received: from localhost ([::1]:53243 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UXf9N-0001di-Ez; Wed, 01 May 2013 15:05:21 -0700 Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.120]:50658) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UXf9H-0001dc-FU for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Wed, 01 May 2013 15:05:20 -0700 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=cYNQXw/M c=1 sm=0 a=sqYj6zCFaLTNQ95sbP+eeQ==:17 a=W3V8cEvdJLQA:10 a=2kayXeI-8hUA:10 a=Yr05hP5UdKEA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=JNFw9bs7AAAA:8 a=Rshj0bW5woQA:10 a=lLCppsXJ8stXso8FOIoA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=UVfkq_fkPbgA:10 a=0esLeR_aMmEA:10 a=go9k3mDdUfgA:10 a=sqYj6zCFaLTNQ95sbP+eeQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Authenticated-User: X-Originating-IP: 69.132.98.107 Received: from [69.132.98.107] ([69.132.98.107:35535] helo=chausie) by cdptpa-oedge03.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 2E/E9-11869-49191815; Wed, 01 May 2013 22:05:08 +0000 Received: from caracal.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 996BB1A326 for ; Wed, 1 May 2013 18:05:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Pierre Abbat To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 18:05:03 -0400 Message-ID: <2384390.W0pUJPLNBR@caracal> User-Agent: KMail/4.8.5 (Linux/3.2.0-39-generic; KDE/4.8.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Subject: [jbovlaste] Type-3 fu'ivla was: newlines X-BeenThere: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: jbovlaste@lojban.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: jbovlaste-bounces@lojban.org Should we add, for every type-3 fu'ivla, the form that uses the long rafsi? Also there are some entries which are meant to be type-3 but aren't. > jongausib - debrpisu Valid type-3, but uses the short rafsi. > jongausib - grutratemoia This is a type-4 as written. It should be "grutrxatemoia" or "grutrtemoia". > jongausib - sparasparagu I'd say "sparago". > jongausib - sparaci This is obviously a type-4 and I racked my brain trying to guess what it means before looking it up and finding it's meant to be a type-3 for some plant I never heard of. > jongausib - tsaprnigru > jongausib - tsaprpipali These are well-formed, but do we need words for every species of pepper spice? Pierre -- gau do li'i co'e kei do _______________________________________________ jbovlaste mailing list jbovlaste@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/jbovlaste