From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Mar 31 15:05:44 2011 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:05:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5Pzs-00021G-GA for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:05:44 -0700 Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com ([74.125.82.181]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5Pzp-00020m-BV for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:05:44 -0700 Received: by wyi11 with SMTP id 11so3176638wyi.40 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:05:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GVbd3FCBJKMQmO5gbXWVvj+mknvt4qO2T8i7tL3/5Hg=; b=aiwEWlbyFUzYAI9G7miVU/80MXAMo0QWOmhyTAmXv+8JyFZW9kP7srpQgebYLOi+0d gHIGj3+H+g3tgRwS8Y9MDgYPpvz3ElBmnRSVfM1cHNrmim9uzqsg3rU5MIkNCFmfzw2o nJ8LvvHrhVNM3diqyPm1WGSm2Ag09Je+oAt3Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=EGgmXn5ASH4S5t99lZO7/KGySRr5vSO5KihzSVtyjUeZDMnvJM73/BbwAUl1ke7ZaA wE4Np/eyDJCxKJKLGCNb6SULZeWr8p7nzDEjuJbebBS7BbOFv4iZLNveS3DadigZ3DS7 lPASrnX2oECCOawLkd2Hv9BwqX1UpcL1ydQgo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.16.98 with SMTP id n34mr3321581wba.31.1301609135060; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:05:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.146.204 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:05:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:05:34 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: proceed/continue/advance From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-archive-position: 11 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Michael Turniansky wrote: > I'm leaning towards lamyzu'e -- > z1 proceeds/continues/advances/takes the next step l1=z2 in sequence of > actions l3 towards goal z3 after step l2 > >   But I'm not really liking it.. >   Opinions?  Better options? > >   It feels like it should be pruce-based, but I can't figure out how. toldenpa? x1 proceeds (from?) x2 with step/action x3 towards ending finishing x4 mu'o mi'e xorxes