From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Mar 31 22:28:53 2011 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:28:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5Wuj-0000Cq-Iz for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:28:53 -0700 Received: from mail-qy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.216.174]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5Wue-0000Cg-AD for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:28:53 -0700 Received: by qyk7 with SMTP id 7so91808qyk.19 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:28:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JLiZj3cuSHIVlGJMVutuPzaloEHiUc2vLwgl1k966Io=; b=PhdZHxIvh6EkEb0g3LnPEwQfnHxLZ+f2PLQDT8a6Uffl5YZx93ar4bb35zuGZja3zo eNsTmgpYoniZSu20Xwbt5Ebk9cR/45rAlMZwhuLHyOWRpKImHGo2OjYwnSkFh7S4wWYs pMqPZ4pRBg3CFOBUy4aD4iGkGBxXO8O4/cufA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=kH9FVFZ6QwtIB90boUKpYixPOcd0AgukCkiwtxa1YfdAtOBfHEGwLOICFTUWDoUsbH HN4PrxglOMWeUKMxkCrlfuqzgCpUMalshU/Jr0gjLlWM4VxgaFoK3iTAsJnKZ65f/UT5 WFqtylL8uGC8zUHHIyOZz3EQNVsu3W9f6HvKU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.94.12 with SMTP id x12mr2926560qcm.286.1301635722311; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:28:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.216.7 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:28:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 01:28:42 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: proceed/continue/advance From: Michael Turniansky To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-archive-position: 12 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: mturniansky@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste 2011/3/31 Jorge Llambías : > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Michael Turniansky > wrote: >> I'm leaning towards lamyzu'e -- >> z1 proceeds/continues/advances/takes the next step l1=z2 in sequence of >> actions l3 towards goal z3 after step l2 >> >>   But I'm not really liking it.. >>   Opinions?  Better options? >> >>   It feels like it should be pruce-based, but I can't figure out how. > > toldenpa? > > x1 proceeds (from?) x2 with step/action x3 towards ending finishing x4 > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > > Not bad. Or even depnonydza: d1 waits for nothing before proceeding from state d3 in process d4 --gejyspa