From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue May 24 19:40:53 2011 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Tue, 24 May 2011 19:40:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QP41l-0000aR-A6 for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:40:53 -0700 Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.120]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QP41i-0000aD-0D for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:40:53 -0700 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=u/nQQYiWxKD5h3SdfpQA5Ows1ULG5UjBZwfBisUcMrs= c=1 sm=0 a=6ti_TD8eFm8A:10 a=wPDyFdB5xvgA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=9o99xeNKNPYSmM5t9x5+TQ==:17 a=oQO3BM4U0Jq-oSk9duUA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=9o99xeNKNPYSmM5t9x5+TQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 75.176.118.168 Received: from [75.176.118.168] ([75.176.118.168:37641] helo=chausie) by cdptpa-oedge04.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 81/1E-28813-D2C6CDD4; Wed, 25 May 2011 02:40:46 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA7E314073 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 22:40:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Pierre Abbat To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: lobster Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 22:40:36 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) References: <67149.39170.qm@web88001.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <292979.17998.qm@web88005.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <20110524164605.GF9018@mercury.ccil.org> In-Reply-To: <20110524164605.GF9018@mercury.ccil.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201105242240.38979.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-archive-position: 23 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@phma.optus.nu Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste On Tuesday 24 May 2011 12:46:05 John Cowan wrote: > A. PIEKARSKI scripsit: > > > breaks into "ne fropi". How about "nerfopi"? Also the family is > > > sometimes called Homaridae, and Homarus was named earlier and has > > > cognates in more languages. > > > > What's "fropi"? > > It isn't anything, but the morphology rules don't care which gismu are > defined and which are not. Nor do they care about whether the cmavo that falls off a brivla makes any sense grammatically. This one doesn't; "ne" has to be followed by a term, and a term can't begin with a brivla. Of course you could say "zo ne fropi", which is grammatical. Pierre -- When a barnacle settles down, its brain disintegrates. Já não percebe nada, já não percebe nada.