Return-path: Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:45:04 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D5STK-0006x4-3i; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:44:50 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:44:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no ([129.241.210.67] ident=[NtOQPiaOiNX1B8ISbvfsDo+mqhWa12VW]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D5STI-0006wy-5Z for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:44:48 -0800 Received: from sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no ([129.241.210.67]:35224 "EHLO grey.nvg.ntnu.no" ident: "[H+A3rK3DfxAJd9qgx1QWgr3Qr5E5v5cq]" whoson: "-unregistered-") by sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no with ESMTP id ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:44:30 +0100 Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no [129.241.210.68]) by grey.nvg.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id B164E947BF for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:44:22 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:44:22 +0100 (CET) From: Arnt Richard Johansen X-X-Sender: arj@hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Subject: [jbovlaste] Disambiguation categories (was: Re: to injure) In-Reply-To: <20050216001004.GK11349@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Message-ID: References: <20050109100728.GF4597@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <200501091021.54281.phma@phma.hn.org> <20050110032312.GP4597@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20050216001004.GK11349@chain.digitalkingdom.org> X-No-Archive: yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-NVG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-NVG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: arj@nvg.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: arj@nvg.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.2 Content-Length: 1029 Lines: 37 On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 07:23:12PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: >> >> I think probably the Right Thing to do is to come up with a list >> of disambiguiting terms that we think are appropriate for an >> actual dictionary. >> >> Some suggestions, just stuff that has come up for me: >> >> agentive >> non-agentive >> mathematical >> computer science >> >> I'd do more right now, but I have many other Lojban things I'm >> doing tonight. Other suggestions? > > Anyone? Anyone? Bueler? Anyone? Making up more terms shouldn't be too much of a problem. But I suspect that coming up with a *good* set, that can be used in the majority of cases, is profoundly difficult. It *might* be a good idea to extract some categories from the gismu list, such as: * shape/form * tool * bodypart -- Arnt Richard Johansen http://arj.nvg.org/ "My speech recognition software may have trouble with ordinary words, but not with ketoprofen." --Magnus Itland