Return-path: Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 12:43:52 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1D7JeE-0002AR-5t; Fri, 04 Mar 2005 12:43:47 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Fri, 04 Mar 2005 12:43:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.44) id 1D7JeC-0002AL-LF for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2005 12:43:44 -0800 Received: from miranda.org ([209.58.150.153] ident=qmailr) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.44) id 1D7JeA-0002AF-Va for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2005 12:43:44 -0800 Received: (qmail 11579 invoked by uid 534); 4 Mar 2005 20:43:41 -0000 From: jkominek@miranda.org Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 13:43:41 -0700 To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: TEI export? Message-ID: <20050304204341.GM16932@miranda.org> References: <4228C300.80709@gulik.co.nz> <20050304202837.GL16932@miranda.org> <4228C7D0.7010905@gulik.co.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4228C7D0.7010905@gulik.co.nz> Accept-Language: jbo, en User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "chain.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 09:40:48AM +1300, Michael van der Gulik wrote: > Which language and database libraries would you prefer? Perl, DBI, DBD::Pg C or C++ and the standard PostgreSQL library would be fine, too. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jkominek@miranda.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "chain.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 09:40:48AM +1300, Michael van der Gulik wrote: > Which language and database libraries would you prefer? Perl, DBI, DBD::Pg C or C++ and the standard PostgreSQL library would be fine, too. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Content-Length: 258 Lines: 12 On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 09:40:48AM +1300, Michael van der Gulik wrote: > Which language and database libraries would you prefer? Perl, DBI, DBD::Pg C or C++ and the standard PostgreSQL library would be fine, too. -- Jay Kominek