Return-path: Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 21:14:48 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FwWsM-0007Gi-7b; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 21:14:34 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Fri, 30 Jun 2006 21:14:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FwWsJ-0007Gc-OF for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 21:14:31 -0700 Received: from phma.optus.nu ([166.82.175.165] helo=ixazon.dynip.com) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FwWsI-0007FZ-Da for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 21:14:31 -0700 Received: from [192.168.25.19] (unknown [192.168.25.19]) by ixazon.dynip.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C167CE459 for ; Sat, 1 Jul 2006 00:14:17 -0400 (EDT) From: Pierre Abbat To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: Fur Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 00:14:08 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <1235867244.20060701094111@mail.ru> In-Reply-To: <1235867244.20060701094111@mail.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200607010014.10825.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@phma.optus.nu Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Content-Length: 361 Lines: 14 On Friday 30 June 2006 22:41, Yanis Batura wrote: > There is 'wool' {sunla}, but no 'fur'. > {sirsunla} is suggested. > > Your opinions? {sirsunla} sounds good to me, though it may be more restricted in usage than "fur" because it's longer than {kerfa}. Maybe one would speak of {tcokumte sirsunla}, because it's used as a fiber, but {mlatu kerfa}. phma