Return-path: Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Sat, 01 Jul 2006 08:19:18 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FwhFK-0007Cz-M6; Sat, 01 Jul 2006 08:18:59 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Sat, 01 Jul 2006 08:18:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FwhFH-0007Ct-2i for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Sat, 01 Jul 2006 08:18:55 -0700 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.177]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FwhFG-0007Ck-7B for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Sat, 01 Jul 2006 08:18:54 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id 39so498134pyu for ; Sat, 01 Jul 2006 08:18:53 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=dntSlb++MWO+GsTjczfawUJbjEPSiKH7D9E8IM9xlmpT78LMG0EL9N/DMrorxxdKnRxPq3Bj5V1eJj7J+MTqsUB5ufLzw/lIZ+bTpCh5UcDHnEwtnU0zCgTGLFRkPULGaHES7vEHcwwQNh1dly8qfC6tLpBje+/li5I4NnirHJE= Received: by 10.35.45.14 with SMTP id x14mr1321752pyj; Sat, 01 Jul 2006 08:18:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.14.17 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Jul 2006 08:18:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d17560607010818i1095523vf582e413f2267869@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 12:18:53 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: Fur In-Reply-To: <200607010014.10825.phma@phma.optus.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1235867244.20060701094111@mail.ru> <200607010014.10825.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) Content-Length: 687 Lines: 21 On 7/1/06, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Friday 30 June 2006 22:41, Yanis Batura wrote: > > There is 'wool' {sunla}, but no 'fur'. > > {sirsunla} is suggested. > > > > Your opinions? > > {sirsunla} sounds good to me, though it may be more restricted in usage > than "fur" because it's longer than {kerfa}. Maybe one would speak of > {tcokumte sirsunla}, because it's used as a fiber, but {mlatu kerfa}. I think the difference between {sunla} and {kerfa} is similar to the difference between {skapi} and {pilka}. {kerfa} and {pilka} are body parts, like {xance} or {tuple} whereas {sunla} and {skapi} are types of material, like {mapni} or {silka}. mu'o mi'e xorxes