Return-path: Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 03:47:11 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GE1rp-0005jo-RE; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 03:46:47 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Fri, 18 Aug 2006 03:46:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GE1rL-0005jK-Vu for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 03:45:53 -0700 Received: from sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no ([129.241.210.67]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GE1qw-0005j3-OI for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 03:45:41 -0700 Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no [129.241.210.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84AAE9479D for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:45:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:45:11 +0200 (CEST) From: Arnt Richard Johansen X-X-Sender: arj@hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: Survey about jbovlaste In-Reply-To: <492596e80608180331p4fdaaf22g1180b2b01c281d09@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <492596e80608180331p4fdaaf22g1180b2b01c281d09@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed X-NVG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-NVG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: arj@nvg.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: arj@nvg.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Content-Length: 1329 Lines: 34 On Fri, 18 Aug 2006, Wang Xuerui wrote: > What kind of new features do you hope to be in jbovlaste? (e.g. adding > multiple natlang words at one time) > > Just a question. I'm now developing jbovlaste, and I don't know what to be > included as "new feature". Every bright idea is expected. Don't stone me, > please. You've started developing Jbovlaste? Neat! The only features I see as lacking in Jbovlaste (apart from mere wishlist requests) are: 1) The ability to _delete_ one's own natlang words and valsi (to fix typos); 2) The ability to vote _against_ a specific valsi, because one thinks it is ill-conceived and should not be in the dictionary; 3) Though this is I believe more Jay's territory, in the long run I think it is very important to be able to export LaTeX code that correctly displays all of Unicode. I believe there are some hanzi in the etymology field in parts of the English dictionary, these should display correctly in the output (currently they don't). All of these I'm pretty sure have been voiced before, in the project's RequestTracker queue. Best of luck. -- Arnt Richard Johansen http://arj.nvg.org/ Du klickar bara på en ikon så SER DU DITT LOKALA NÄTVERK. -- Z mag@zine lovpriser Win95 i nr. 7/95