Return-path: Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 23:20:44 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GEKBp-0007yD-Pd; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 23:20:14 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Fri, 18 Aug 2006 23:20:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GEKBm-0007y6-Cn for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 23:20:10 -0700 Received: from imo-m26.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.7]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GEKBk-0007xw-Jy for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 23:20:10 -0700 Received: from MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com by imo-m26.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.6.) id d.c4d.1d257e (43932) for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2006 02:20:02 -0400 (EDT) From: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Message-ID: Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 02:20:01 EDT Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: Survey about jbovlaste To: jbovlaste@lojban.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_c4d.1d257e.32180791_boundary" X-Mailer: 6.0 for Windows XP sub 11501 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) Content-Length: 2241 Lines: 63 --part1_c4d.1d257e.32180791_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 8/18/2006 5:57:02 AM Central Standard Time, idontknw.wang@gmail.com writes: > > >> 2) The ability to vote _against_ a specific valsi, because one thinks it >> > > Good idea. I think we can also give reasons for voting, then we can start to > "debate" on jbovlaste! > > > Wasn't this what the elephant was for? And whatever happened to the elephant? stevo --part1_c4d.1d257e.32180791_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 8/18/2006 5:57:0= 2 AM Central Standard Time, idontknw.wang@gmail.com writes:

2) The ability to vote _aga= inst_ a specific valsi, because one thinks it
is ill-conceived and should not be in the dictionary;=

Good idea. I think we can also give reasons for voting, then we can star= t to "debate" on jbovlaste!=20

Wasn't this what the elephant was for? And whatever happen= ed to the elephant?

stevo --part1_c4d.1d257e.32180791_boundary--