Return-path: Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 10:22:43 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GYQjh-0006SU-Ha; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 10:22:25 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Fri, 13 Oct 2006 10:22:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GYQje-0006SN-Bv for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 10:22:14 -0700 Received: from mx.211.ru ([193.238.131.194]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GYQjZ-0006SA-UI for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 10:22:14 -0700 Received: from localhost (mx.211.ru [193.238.131.194]) by mx.211.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17072EBD2C for ; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 00:22:06 +0700 (NOVST) Received: from mx.211.ru ([193.238.131.194]) by localhost (mx.211.ru [193.238.131.194]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 87719-05 for ; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 00:22:04 +0700 (NOVST) Received: from mail.211.ru (mail [10.5.1.2]) by mx.211.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53FAFEBD2B for ; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 00:22:04 +0700 (NOVST) Received: from host-102-2-129.211.ru (host-102-2-129.211.ru [10.102.2.129]) by mail.211.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75E775C1B for ; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 00:22:59 +0700 (NOVST) Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 00:22:01 +0700 From: Yanis Batura X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.71.04) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <236391198.20061014002201@mail.ru> To: Theodore Reed Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: Examples in jbovlaste In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: ybatura@mail.ru Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) Content-Length: 483 Lines: 19 On 13.10.2006, 23:14, Theodore Reed wrote: > On 10/13/06, Yanis Batura wrote: >> Well then, I vote for common examples for the whole dictionary entry :) > Also, Yanis, one thing you may be missing is that, until it's actually > defined, a lujvo is just as ambiguous as any tanru. This is one of the > reasons why I dislike nonce lujvo. What do you mean by "actually defined"? mi'e .ianis. --------------------- Lojban: A Language With *Intelligent* Design