Return-path: Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 10:39:41 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Gec2U-0008Db-DD; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 10:39:20 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Mon, 30 Oct 2006 10:39:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Gec2S-0008DV-18 for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 10:39:12 -0800 Received: from sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no ([129.241.210.67]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Gec2L-0008DO-IN for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 10:39:11 -0800 Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no [129.241.210.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D42794783 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:38:48 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:38:48 +0100 (CET) From: Arnt Richard Johansen X-X-Sender: arj@hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: kantcu In-Reply-To: <925d17560610301029y12d8b28fneded3df0aef2fd45@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <925d17560610301029y12d8b28fneded3df0aef2fd45@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-NVG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-NVG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: arj@nvg.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: arj@nvg.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Content-Length: 479 Lines: 17 On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Jorge Llambías wrote: > On 10/30/06, Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: >> How did "kantcu" end up in the notes of "se'a"? > > Do you mean because of the {ntc} or because you don't see > how it could be related to {se'a nai}? The former. -- Arnt Richard Johansen http://arj.nvg.org/ Inuktitut iis eesseentiiaallyy Fiinniish aas spooqqeen iin Greenlaand. --Clint Jackson Baker, via Essentialist Explanations