Return-path: X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Sun, 13 May 2007 19:38:11 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HnQRj-0008Vp-Sw; Sun, 13 May 2007 19:38:03 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Sun, 13 May 2007 19:37:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HnQRJ-0008Vb-Qg for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Sun, 13 May 2007 19:37:34 -0700 Received: from phma.optus.nu ([166.82.175.165] helo=ixazon.dynip.com) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HnQRE-0008V4-CE; Sun, 13 May 2007 19:37:32 -0700 Received: from chausie (unknown [192.168.7.4]) by ixazon.dynip.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07627CEAA0; Sun, 13 May 2007 22:37:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Pierre Abbat To: jbovlaste@lojban.org, lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: jbovlaste natlang word voting question Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 22:37:22 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <20070513031708.GX16151@digitalkingdom.org> In-Reply-To: <20070513031708.GX16151@digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200705132237.22822.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@phma.optus.nu Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 576 Lines: 17 On Saturday 12 May 2007 23:17, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > A jbovlaste question; if you don't care about how jbovlaste works or > is laid out, move along. > > I'm pondering the nature of natlang word voting; look at > http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/natlang/en/computer%20program for > example (if anyone can suggest a better example, where "better" is > defined here as "more contention", please speak up). I wouldn't say this has more contention, as there's only one vote, but there are three Lojban words for "sesame", all synonyms, fu'ivla from different languages. phma