Return-path: X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 02:01:00 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Lj8gi-0004nb-3h; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 02:00:50 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Mon, 16 Mar 2009 02:00:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Lj8gC-0004nK-A8 for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 02:00:16 -0700 Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.168]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <00ai99@gmail.com>) id 1Lj8g0-0004kp-GQ for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 02:00:16 -0700 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 23so3028920wfg.25 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 01:59:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=A/l8AX1T51CRxeSvA5gijO4+xwNK/Fu3NbMPvMe/RRQ=; b=h+YBSQaoU5ebUTI9phb2ZSswSELle81VGuh8Zxs/PkSoaZHCbJstPZYACUcy5weolH xjzmM9VAWPs8w9z97dZezt4sW2L0M7TC+B1IAS0zWcayUvbDLfjZ33CfgZ+0xpv7kBHz 1XjZLGYjreWz6gLdohTrfAiWmk1Dd8BzCUMj8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=T1XQC8GnPnJBHSQhgYK3E4Eg2qs2JdJ00P1Ewe2v/zQ0E4aHtXYOF+oasU4CwlBzyA kE0/B3Icy42twmNLucTJjmPOHFOiQjlwmlmAQc8ZmYw7NrAieRRuvlrNa0OHvqGqDLMH HhDaX5WjDEZxPCBiTlqZP3WIr4CJrxhtVLnt0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.177.13 with SMTP id z13mr1182357wfe.184.1237193998517; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 01:59:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090316081536.GX7405@nvg.org> References: <20090316081536.GX7405@nvg.org> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:29:58 +1030 Message-ID: <23f4e3390903160159g71733791u8d30bc82b5e7bd3b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: [jvs-watch] Per www-data : Bad NatLangWords Report From: David Gowers <00ai99@gmail.com> To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: 00ai99@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 790 Lines: 26 On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: > On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 09:15:29PM +0000, www-data wrote: >> >> >> The following words in the given languages have a null definition *AND* a not null definition.  Please fix. > > Please explain. What's a null definition? If you look at http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/natlang/en/solid http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/natlang/en/product it appears to refer to a word that is used in no definitions - which basically amounts to a nonexistent definition. Er. I mean, there is a 'sense' defined for a particular word, but there is no actual definition attached to it. When I look at these definitions, I wonder whether they are the result of some "I'll fill that in later" thoughts, that were never fulfilled. David