Return-path: X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:18:22 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MHJNV-0000J3-Lo; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:18:16 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:17:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MHJMc-0000Ir-F9 for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:17:18 -0700 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MHJMc-0000Ij-2v for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:17:18 -0700 Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:17:18 -0700 From: Robin Lee Powell To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: Maybe I missed it... Message-ID: <20090618151717.GB27528@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: jbovlaste@lojban.org References: <40b71af30906172206v4ea04fc6m3789e254b95b4f34@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40b71af30906172206v4ea04fc6m3789e254b95b4f34@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 741 Lines: 21 On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 01:06:28AM -0400, Frank wrote: > coi, If I believe a "preferred" entry in the jbovlaste is > somewhat inaccurate, what constitutes the accepted method of > proposing an alternative/substitute entry? If it's a simple inaccuracy, just modify it in place. If you really think some people will prefer the old version to yours, but you don't know who will be in the majority, add a new one, but modifying in place is preferred. -Robin -- They say: "The first AIs will be built by the military as weapons." And I'm thinking: "Does it even occur to you to try for something other than the default outcome?" See http://shrunklink.com/cdiz http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/