Return-path: X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:28:48 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MdRXv-00012l-LD; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:28:36 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:27:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MdRX4-00012d-VH for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:27:35 -0700 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MdRX4-00012V-JP for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:27:34 -0700 Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:27:34 -0700 From: Robin Lee Powell To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: How do I get off this mailing list? Message-ID: <20090818162734.GM7487@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: jbovlaste@lojban.org References: <200908180802.34680.jp.sittingduck@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200908180802.34680.jp.sittingduck@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 873 Lines: 31 You need to tell me, and I disable your jbovlaste account. If you're adding things to jbovlaste, you need to be on this list. -Robin On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 08:02:34AM +0000, Joshua Phillips wrote: > I seem to remember that I've already tried once... > > On Tuesday 18 August 2009 02:08:12 MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com wrote: > > In a message dated 8/17/2009 09:08:29 Eastern Daylight Time, > > > > jbotijlan@gmail.com writes: > > > "si'e" would have been an alternative if it had a rafsi. > > > > So why not use "zei" with "si'e"? That's what "zei" is for. > > > > stevo > > > > > -- They say: "The first AIs will be built by the military as weapons." And I'm thinking: "Does it even occur to you to try for something other than the default outcome?" See http://shrunklink.com/cdiz http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/