Return-path: X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:56:48 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MdSvH-0001NH-2P; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:56:44 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:56:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MdSus-0001N3-Bf for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:56:14 -0700 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MdSus-0001Mo-0o for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:56:14 -0700 Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:56:14 -0700 From: Robin Lee Powell To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: How do I get off this mailing list? Message-ID: <20090818175613.GR7487@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: jbovlaste@lojban.org References: <200908180802.34680.jp.sittingduck@gmail.com> <20090818162734.GM7487@digitalkingdom.org> <200908181746.51191.jp.sittingduck@gmail.com> <5715b9300908181052w3288a8b2w1b98ed75104ec478@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5715b9300908181052w3288a8b2w1b98ed75104ec478@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 1622 Lines: 50 Yeah, but all the people that have been doing huge amounts of jbovlaste work lately are staying, so enh. :) (Note that the list membership gets updated automatically every few hours, so if you're still seeing this and you shouldn't be, that's why.) -Robin On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 01:52:24PM -0400, Luke Bergen wrote: > .u'esai so'imei pe'a plipe be fi lo bloti be'o cliva .i .uinairu'e (is there > a better attitudinal for *sigh*?) > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Joshua Phillips > wrote: > > > Yes, please remove me from the list. Thanks :) > > > > On Tuesday 18 August 2009 16:27:34 Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > > You need to tell me, and I disable your jbovlaste account. If > > > you're adding things to jbovlaste, you need to be on this list. > > > > > > -Robin > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 08:02:34AM +0000, Joshua Phillips wrote: > > > > I seem to remember that I've already tried once... > > > > > > > > On Tuesday 18 August 2009 02:08:12 MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com wrote: > > > > > In a message dated 8/17/2009 09:08:29 Eastern Daylight Time, > > > > > > > > > > jbotijlan@gmail.com writes: > > > > > > "si'e" would have been an alternative if it had a rafsi. > > > > > > > > > > So why not use "zei" with "si'e"? That's what "zei" is for. > > > > > > > > > > stevo > > > > > > > > -- They say: "The first AIs will be built by the military as weapons." And I'm thinking: "Does it even occur to you to try for something other than the default outcome?" See http://shrunklink.com/cdiz http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/