Return-path: X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:08:59 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MlPiz-0004ix-F6; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:08:53 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:08:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MlPiI-0004ip-2B for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:08:06 -0700 Received: from sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no ([129.241.210.67]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MlPiA-0004i0-Ku for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:08:05 -0700 Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (unknown [IPv6:2001:700:300:2000:2a0:c9ff:feab:76e2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 107FF94796 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 18:07:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (8.13.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id n89G7HUB015210 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 18:07:17 +0200 Received: (from arj@localhost) by hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id n89G7B0j015209 for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 18:07:11 +0200 Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 18:07:10 +0200 From: Arnt Richard Johansen To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: [jvsw] New NatLang Word network node -- By totus Message-ID: <20090909160710.GJ2685@nvg.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-NVG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-NVG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: arj@nvg.ntnu.no X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: arj@nvg.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 625 Lines: 19 > Word: network node > > In Sense: as in computer network > Word: network node > > In Sense: as in the Internet What is the difference between these two? Why does it need to have a sub-sense at all? It is hardly a polysemous term. -- Arnt Richard Johansen http://arj.nvg.org/ Read This Before Opening Package: According to Certain Suggested Versions of a Grand Unified Theory, the Primary Particles Constituting This Product May Decay to Nothingness Within the Next Four Hundred Million Years. --Susan Hewitt and Edward Subitzky