Return-path: X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:22:23 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Mo7ZR-0004kr-FQ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:22:14 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:21:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Mo7Z7-0004kj-Do for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:21:49 -0700 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Mo7Z7-0004kb-72 for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:21:49 -0700 Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:21:49 -0700 From: Robin Lee Powell To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: [jvsw] New NatLang Word homosexual female -- By daniel Message-ID: <20090917032149.GD7185@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: jbovlaste@lojban.org References: <20090917030108.GB7185@digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 682 Lines: 20 On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 05:14:16AM +0200, Daniel Brockman wrote: > > FWIW, I find "is attracted to females" *far* more useful in > > practice in my life, and wish English had a word for it.  Then, > > if you must express "homosexual female", you just say "[broda] > > ninmu". Getting the other one when you don't have it is harder. > > That's {fetcinse}. Long as it's in there. :) Thanks. -Robin -- They say: "The first AIs will be built by the military as weapons." And I'm thinking: "Does it even occur to you to try for something other than the default outcome?" See http://shrunklink.com/cdiz http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/