Return-path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on chain.digitalkingdom.org Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 15:43:46 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([192.168.123.127]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OuvGY-0001pq-LI; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 15:43:19 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Sun, 12 Sep 2010 15:42:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OuvFq-0001pa-8v for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 15:42:34 -0700 Received: from sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no ([129.241.210.67]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OuvFl-0001pQ-Vr for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 15:42:34 -0700 Received: from sprocket.nvg.ntnu.no (sprocket.nvg.ntnu.no [IPv6:2001:700:300:2000:92e6:baff:fe68:dd1c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02BCA94786 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 00:42:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from sprocket.nvg.ntnu.no (arj@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sprocket.nvg.ntnu.no (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id o8CMgK59030846 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 00:42:20 +0200 Received: (from arj@localhost) by sprocket.nvg.ntnu.no (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o8CMgJsM030844 for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 00:42:19 +0200 Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 00:42:19 +0200 From: Arnt Richard Johansen To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: [jvsw] New NatLang Word accretion disk -- By VesRul Message-ID: <20100912224219.GB4792@nvg.org> References: <20100909163902.GY2984@nvg.org> <20100912072605.GA4792@nvg.org> <20100912211747.GT13937@digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100912211747.GT13937@digitalkingdom.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-NVG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-NVG-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service Provider for details X-MailScanner-From: arj@nvg.ntnu.no Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: arj@nvg.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 1714 Lines: 37 On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 02:17:47PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 09:26:05AM +0200, Arnt Richard Johansen > wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 03:31:42PM -0600, Jonathan Jones wrote: > > > Does jbovlaste warn about the sense field during word > > > submission, or only on the automatic notice as below? > > > > I tried that, but unfortunately no. As long as the word “accretion > > disk; astronomy” exists, if you try to submit a definition that > > points to just “accretion disk”, you can't get past the “Check > > Definition” part of the submission. > > > > This is a Jbovlaste bug, of course, > > It's not actually; it's behaving exactly as designed. The idea was > that natlang words should almost always have senses, because natlang > words are almost always polysemous. I take that back. It's not a bug, it's a misfeature. :-) (http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/M/misfeature.html) > Why do you think that this behaviour is bad? This behaviour is bad if “accretion disk” is specific enough by itself. At the very least, I think the check should only be against natlang words that are _not_ the natlang word that is being changed. That is, if you're removing the subsense of the only entry in that natlang word family, it should be allowed. -- Arnt Richard Johansen http://arj.nvg.org/ Public Notice as Required by Law: Any Use of This Product, in Any Manner Whatsoever, Will Increase the Amount of Disorder in the Universe. Although No Liability Is Implied Herein, the Consumer Is Warned That This Process Will Ultimately Lead to the Heat Death of the Universe. --Susan Hewitt and Edward Subitzky