Return-path: <jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org>
X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on
	chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on
	chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	version=3.2.5
Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Delivery-date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:25:26 -0700
Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org>)
	id 1N3zu3-000234-5W; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:25:07 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:24:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69)	(envelope-from <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>)	id 1N3ztH-00022w-Mq	for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:24:15 -0700
Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.121])	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)	(envelope-from <phma@phma.optus.nu>)	id 1N3ztC-00022m-Tc	for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:24:15 -0700
Received: from chausie ([71.75.215.96]) by cdptpa-omta04.mail.rr.com          with ESMTP          id <20091030222403891.BUFM2056@cdptpa-omta04.mail.rr.com>          for <jbovlaste@lojban.org>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:24:03 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23029FA2D	for <jbovlaste@lojban.org>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:24:01 -0400 (EDT)
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>
To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: the common cold and the flu
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:23:55 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405)
References: <200910281137.09403.phma@phma.optus.nu> <200910290215.09643.phma@phma.optus.nu> <12d58c160910301043l14651f33kb58162f849c157e0@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <12d58c160910301043l14651f33kb58162f849c157e0@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200910301823.57249.phma@phma.optus.nu>
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: phma@phma.optus.nu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org
X-list: jbovlaste
Content-Length: 659
Lines: 18

On Friday 30 October 2009 13:43:13 komfo,amonan wrote:
> You're coining two words for one concept, unless I'm missing something.
> Another approach would be to leave the place structure of {bilma} in place
> for its derived fu'ivla. Hence, {lo tolvutu} would be the sufferer & {lo te
> tolvutu} would be the disease.

I don't see a need for x3 of "bilma" in a word for "has <a specific> disease". 
x3 is the disease, which is specified, so I leave it off. As to having two 
words, we have the same in English: "rabies" and "rabid", "diabetes" 
and "diabetic", and so on.

Pierre
-- 
li ze te'a ci vu'u ci bi'e te'a mu du
li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u ci