Return-path: X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.1 Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 10:56:57 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IZVhG-0008KD-VU; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 10:56:49 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Sun, 23 Sep 2007 10:56:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IZVgq-0008K5-F1 for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 10:56:20 -0700 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IZVgq-0008Jy-0G for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 10:56:20 -0700 Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 10:56:19 -0700 From: Robin Lee Powell To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: jbovlaste erroneously states original creator as the person who edited a definition Message-ID: <20070923175619.GA2671@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: jbovlaste@lojban.org References: <46F63C7C.8060103@perpetuum-immobile.de> <482830.28303.qm@web28109.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 1139 Lines: 28 On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 08:45:24AM -0400, Matt Arnold wrote: > On 9/23/07, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote: > > > i just edited two or three definitions by ott and in the > > > recent changes list it says "definition update by ott". > > > > I noticed that too when editing your definitions ;). I agree > > that this behaviour is incorrect and confusing and should be > > changed. My suggestion is to use a revision controll system and > > a plain text storage for the text, so we wouldn't need the web > > interface (which is a bit buggy and has a slow insertion > > procedure). I vote for git, mercurial or darcs. > > Do you want the Lojban language to not be developed by people who > don't know what that is? Or will you write the documentation that > will introduce them to it? He means a private repository; just because something is in git doesn't mean everyone knows where it is or can access it. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/