Return-path: X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.1 Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 11:11:15 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IZVv7-0000gp-Oc; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 11:11:07 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Sun, 23 Sep 2007 11:10:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IZVux-0000gg-Sh for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 11:10:56 -0700 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IZVux-0000gX-9d for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 11:10:55 -0700 Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 11:10:55 -0700 From: Robin Lee Powell To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: jbovlaste erroneously states original creator as the person who edited a definition Message-ID: <20070923181055.GE2671@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: jbovlaste@lojban.org References: <46F63C7C.8060103@perpetuum-immobile.de> <482830.28303.qm@web28109.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <20070923175619.GA2671@digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 884 Lines: 29 On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 02:07:28PM -0400, Matt Arnold wrote: > Sorry, I was ambiguous. I did not mean You weren't, actually; I missed a "not". > "do you want the Lojban language to be developed by people who > don't know what Lojban is?" > > I meant > > "do you want to restrict Lojban language development to only those > people who know what you mean when you use words like > 'repository', 'revision control system', 'git', 'mercurial' or > 'darcs'?" Ah. Traditionally, jbovlaste access has been quite restricted; I opened it up to see what would happen. So far, Ott has been one of the things that has happened, so yeah, I'm inclined to leave it as open as possible. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/