Return-path: X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.1 Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 11:03:12 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IZVnJ-0000Nt-Ek; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 11:03:04 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Sun, 23 Sep 2007 11:02:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IZVn5-0000Nk-9w for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 11:02:47 -0700 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IZVn4-0000Nb-OS for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 11:02:47 -0700 Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 11:02:46 -0700 From: Robin Lee Powell To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: jbovlaste erroneously states original creator as the person who edited a definition Message-ID: <20070923180246.GC2671@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: jbovlaste@lojban.org References: <46F63C7C.8060103@perpetuum-immobile.de> <482830.28303.qm@web28109.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <482830.28303.qm@web28109.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 1024 Lines: 27 On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 02:14:21PM +0200, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote: > My suggestion is to use a revision controll system and a plain > text storage for the text, so we wouldn't need the web interface > (which is a bit buggy and has a slow insertion procedure). I vote > for git, mercurial or darcs. 1. That's a really bad idea: plain text doesn't enforce formats well, and people *will* screw the format up, and then someone has to go and correct all the screwups. Are you volunteering? 2. I'm certainly not writing the code for it. Again, are you volunteering? 3. If you see a bug, the solution is to bring it to someone's attention, via this list or via rt-jvs@lojban.org. Then, if I have time, I'll work on it. It would sure be nice to have someone else to help on jbovlaste coding, but it's just me. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/