Return-path: X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:49:42 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MMCMf-0003ZU-0z; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:49:35 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:48:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MMCLs-0003ZL-Im for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:48:44 -0700 Received: from mail-vw0-f202.google.com ([209.85.212.202]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MMCLm-0003Z2-1T for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:48:44 -0700 Received: by vwj40 with SMTP id 40so734259vwj.28 for ; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:48:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ba+91gC2aLjuqyZl6MdtIS4/iBqQkOG2+xefXjcJwuo=; b=VSJog9d96SGYRuXXpg6cZw+E/lt3WBSFw8cR6C7Sywh4p5QV5z8gO+6LcA8hHCN0bi KZ4uAypcU+qLMQ4Icw1ohF5OZlxiUDVAbhbz36VqpqBhgR++n26sRCnrOOPrIzB3i6/I b8bjJXAOkRM8/KP2U3bXxFIcIpDyLHMOQUxIs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ItcFjDCx78jIzoIrcql3ALgR8pmRKor++HWb7QZz0NdWbGA3xtxMytE/ij2Iwl07Bp ioXHmj1PK/WeEzIAjA/XcPsIrgsHUtGQP9ROIFCm+igqsEulAcfgnEhWRZNMXulcCdrZ iPhtb3HjOWlh1qWK/6t+2AWWNbxsltc85OoEw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.73.209 with SMTP id r17mr10365288vcj.113.1246502911172; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:48:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <645ACF0B-09EC-449C-B7B4-17502608F360@mac.com> References: <20090620153541.GA23324@nvg.org> <714658.84884.qm@web88007.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <645ACF0B-09EC-449C-B7B4-17502608F360@mac.com> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 22:48:31 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: Request For Comments: proposed Jbovlaste guidelines From: Matt Arnold To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: matt.mattarn@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 979 Lines: 36 The reason I was disallowed from a jbovlaste account is that example,based on the text I submitted, I was deemed under-qualified to invent valid new lujvo. If I were granted a jbovlaste account, I could use it to apply these guidelines to existing definitions; that would not require that I possess the expertise to invent new lujvo. Therefore, I would like to re-apply for a jbovlaste account. -Eppcott On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Kevin Reid wrote: > On Jun 29, 2009, at 14:12, A. PIEKARSKI wrote: > >> I really like these guidelines and I wish I had know about them >> earlier.  I certainly intend to use them, except for... >> "...the notes field for a lujvo should not explain which gismu it is >> composed of..." >> >> Why so? > > I don't know the original motive, but such information could be computed > rather than handwritten. > > -- > Kevin Reid                                   > > > > > > > >