Return-path: X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 05:32:03 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MMLSE-0004zD-ER; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 05:31:57 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Thu, 02 Jul 2009 05:31:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MMLRZ-0004z4-Of for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 05:31:13 -0700 Received: from mail-fx0-f211.google.com ([209.85.220.211]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MMLRS-0004vj-Sk for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 05:31:13 -0700 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so1345375fxm.34 for ; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 05:31:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wqAZyM4xd9S9zYK1h69POj3S20a2HS0uRABwI196AuY=; b=irazGmosfGOSjyeh1jl38lGZdbtg7Kw6iIm2V4HvmQMBNP+WebDKMT2KUc84ewjsXK eLxiqfkcKC9GIvZcCc3koVFvAHYxiOyYhcKdpZHQV8TE4fpnYDZiKYyjKf7dt2rfDmNg eqPkbQMg3Xvk0wbjCz4EllwOigV4W1o7ctJHo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=N+vRSdzgaBBmveiRy9MmNyhsaMtOaquj/dR4qlOBbIZgcS1v1WA0D/gM9ZKeg4w4gN O4/+kjVciu7uNXFf22BcydP7aRrou5GdpzYHCfoaRMN8VHzerbuoAWtkJk8D5Y/X31+V KdG6b7c9gqJ2xyMoifppuc117WCcgIwj+JbdI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.213.10 with SMTP id p10mr6327425muq.132.1246537860429; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 05:31:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090620153541.GA23324@nvg.org> References: <20090620153541.GA23324@nvg.org> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 14:31:00 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: f95cf4274b7e6b24 Message-ID: <4de8c3930907020531v3706d36fy1dad8713520585a5@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: Request For Comments: proposed Jbovlaste guidelines From: tijlan To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jbotijlan@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 1271 Lines: 41 >> Terms that specify which field a jargon term belongs to (mathematics, botany, etc.) are likewise to be avoided. Incorrect * e-mail (noun) / e-mail (verb) * point (needle) / point (mathematics) Correct * e-mail (message) / e-mail (send e-mail) * point (of a needle) / point (mathematical) << "message" can be either "to message" (to send e-mail) or "a message" (an e-mail). mu'o mi'e tijlan 2009/6/20 Arnt Richard Johansen : > I've noticed that each Jbovlaste editor writes definitions in slightly different styles. This is not the editors' fault; IMHO we have a lack of good documentation for how to do dictionary work. I'm trying to remedy this by coming up with a set of guidelines. > > I would like Jbovlaste to be as uniform and consistent as possible. This means encouraging new definitions to be written in the same "house style", and revising old definitions to conform. > > Please have a look here: > http://www.lojban.org/tiki//tiki-index.php?page=Proposed+jbovlaste+guidelines > > and comment here and/or in the "Discuss" tab. You can also edit the page directly. > > -- > Arnt Richard Johansen                                http://arj.nvg.org/ > Si hoc legere scis, nimium eruditionis habes. > > > >