Return-path: X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 04:17:59 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MPx41-0000Kw-If; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 04:17:53 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Sun, 12 Jul 2009 04:16:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MPx35-0000Ki-6j for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 04:16:52 -0700 Received: from kcout01.prserv.net ([12.154.55.31]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MPx2x-0000Js-66 for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 04:16:47 -0700 Received: from [192.168.0.102] (cpe-67-249-58-190.twcny.res.rr.com[67.249.58.190]) by prserv.net (kcout01) with SMTP id <200907121116362010026hjle> (Authid: usinet.kpreid); Sun, 12 Jul 2009 11:16:37 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [67.249.58.190] Message-Id: From: Kevin Reid To: jbovlaste@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <832317.47152.qm@web88007.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: jbovlaste new entries Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 07:16:34 -0400 References: <12d58c160907020926q110af50ct2305b84a6266d886@mail.gmail.com> <4de8c3930907021140s3100c9b9j28f6794c172dbbf3@mail.gmail.com> <832317.47152.qm@web88007.mail.re2.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: kpreid@mac.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 865 Lines: 31 On Jul 5, 2009, at 7:43, A. PIEKARSKI wrote: > ----- Original Message ---- >> From: tijlan >> To: jbovlaste@lojban.org >> Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2009 2:40:58 PM >> Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: jbovlaste new entries >> >> >> flari'a (enact; legal) >> r1=f5 enacts law r2=f1 for community f3 under condition r3=f4 >> > I guess it's OK to have alternatives, but be aware that jbovlaste > already has {flatruci'e}, {zuktruci'e} and {pairtruci'e} for the three > branches of government. It seems to me a bit unlojbanic to have {ciste} in these lujvo like trying to distinguish a noun from a verb (govern vs. government). What additional information/restriction does {ci'e} convey here? (I notice that the gismu list does have {truci'e} in the notes, though.) -- Kevin Reid